Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am69-sk: Add phase tags marking

["Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>]

On 8/11/2023 11:24 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 23:05-20230811, Kumar, Udit wrote:
>> Hi Apurva
>>
>> On 8/11/2023 8:46 PM, Apurva Nandan wrote:
>>> bootph-all as phase tag was added to dt-schema
>>> (dtschema/schemas/bootph.yaml) to cover U-Boot challenges with DT.
>>> That's why add it also to Linux to be aligned with bootloader requirement.
>>>
>>> wkup_uart0, wkup_i2c0, mcu_uart0, main_uart8, main_sdhci0 and main_sdhci1
>>> are required for bootloader operation on TI K3 AM69-SK EVM. These IPs
>>> along with pinmuxes need to be marked for all bootloader phases, hence add
>>> bootph-all to these nodes in kernel dts.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> [...]
>>>    &wkup_uart0 {
>>> +	bootph-all;
>>>    	/* Firmware usage */
>>>    	status = "reserved";
>>>    	pinctrl-names = "default";
>> I am not sure, if you want to treat wkup_uart in same way as you are
>> treating secure_proxy_mcu in patch 1 of this series.
> You should'nt. wkup_uart0 or what ever peripherals are specifically
> board dependent. This patch does it the right way. I do have other
> platforms on other K3 SoCs where the TIFS uart logs are actually
> disabled.

Sorry, if i was not clear in my previous response.

This node is marked as reserved, adding bootph is not adding any value.

We can drop bootph from this node here.

>> IMO, where we are making this node status is okay, mark booth-all at that
>> place only.
>>
>> Otherwise for rest of series
>>
>> LGTM
> Do i take that as a Reviewed-by: for the series?


With above change,

Reviewed-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>

>>
> [...]
>