From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, sstabellini@kernel.org,
jgross@suse.com, oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: mm: Add invalidate back in arch_sync_dma_for_device when FROM_DEVICE
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 10:23:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f41f4fb9-9459-1fa1-494f-c20033c315da@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXENCa5TK9EnRa9Mtn+xGLrnV_X0sAkTC64GVOShDsTK1Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 2022-11-17 08:24, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 07:33, Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> The commit c50f11c6196f ("arm64: mm: Don't invalidate FROM_DEVICE
>> buffers at start of DMA transfer") replaces invalidate with clean
>> when DMA_FROM_DEVICE, this changes the behavior of functions like
>> dma_map_single() and dma_sync_single_for_device(*, *, *, DMA_FROM_DEVICE),
>> then it may make some drivers works unwell because the implementation
>> of these DMA APIs lose the original cache invalidation.
>>
>> Situation 1:
> ...
>> Situation 2:
>> After backporting the above commit, we find a network card driver go
>> wrong with cache inconsistency when doing DMA transfer: CPU got the
>> stale data in cache when reading DMA data received from device.
>
> I suppose this means those drivers may lack dma_sync_single_for_cpu()
> calls after the inbound transfers complete, and are instead relying on
> the cache invalidation performed before the transfer to make the DMA'd
> data visible to the CPU.
It also commonly goes wrong the other way round when the drivers are
correct but DT/ACPI failed to indicate a coherent device as such. If
writes from the device actually snoop, they hit the still-present cache
line, which then gets invalidated by unmap/sync_for_cpu and the new data
is lost.
Robin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-17 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-17 7:21 Nanyong Sun
2022-11-17 8:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-11-17 10:23 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2022-11-20 2:58 ` Nanyong Sun
2022-11-20 2:59 ` Nanyong Sun
2022-11-24 20:04 ` Robin Murphy
2022-12-06 17:07 ` Nanyong Sun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f41f4fb9-9459-1fa1-494f-c20033c315da@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®