mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] perf stat: Add --exclude-guest option
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 09:36:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f436dc23-bcaf-493b-93a9-699b63a18d46@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZvMfVe1VXwhCIOB9@google.com>



On 24/09/2024 9:21 pm, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 09:47:17AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/09/2024 3:33 pm, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2024-09-05 4:24 p.m., Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>>> This option is to support the old behavior of setting exclude_guest by
>>>> default.  Now it doesn't set the bit so users want the old behavior can
>>>> use this option.
>>>>
>>>>     $ perf stat true
>>>>
>>>>      Performance counter stats for 'true':
>>>>
>>>>                   0.86 msec task-clock:u                     #    0.443 CPUs utilized
>>>>                      0      context-switches:u               #    0.000 /sec
>>>>                      0      cpu-migrations:u                 #    0.000 /sec
>>>>                     49      page-faults:u                    #   56.889 K/sec
>>>>                    ...
>>>>
>>>>     $ perf stat --exclude-guest true
>>>>
>>>>      Performance counter stats for 'true':
>>>>
>>>>                   0.79 msec task-clock:Hu                    #    0.490 CPUs utilized
>>>>                      0      context-switches:Hu              #    0.000 /sec
>>>>                      0      cpu-migrations:Hu                #    0.000 /sec
>>>>                     49      page-faults:Hu                   #   62.078 K/sec
>>>>                    ...
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt | 7 +++++++
>>>>    tools/perf/builtin-stat.c              | 2 ++
>>>>    2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt
>>>> index 2bc06367248691dd..d28d8370a856598f 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt
>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt
>>>> @@ -382,6 +382,13 @@ color the metric's computed value.
>>>>    Don't print output, warnings or messages. This is useful with perf stat
>>>>    record below to only write data to the perf.data file.
>>>> +--exclude-guest::
>>>> +Don't count event in the guest mode.  It was the old behavior but the
>>>> +default is changed to count guest events also.  Use this option if you
>>>> +want the old behavior (host only).  Note that this option needs to be
>>>> +before other events in case you added -e/--event option in the command
>>>> +line.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if we really need this option. I think it may bring more
>>> trouble than what we get.
>>>
>>> The name of the "--exclude-guest" sounds like a replacement of the event
>>> modifier "H". But in fact, it's not. It should only affect the default.
>>> It doesn't set the "H" for any events.
> 
> Well I think it's tricky but it'd set "H" modifier events after the
> option.  But I have to agree that it can bring more troubles.
> 
>>>
>>> Except for the perf kvm user, I don't think there are many users which
>>> care the exclude_guest. The behavior of the perf kvm is not changed. So
>>> the option seems not that important. If we really want an option to
>>> restore the old behavior, it's better to choose a better name and update
>>> the description.
> 
> Personally I don't want to this option but just worried if there's a
> case where exclude_guest is preferred.
> 
>>
>> Do we not want to keep exclude_guest for record, but remove it for stat?
> 
> What I really want is to synchronize record and stat behavior in terms
> of the default exclusion mode.  If everyone is fine, I'd like to remove
> exclude_guest from the default and set it only if needed (through the
> fallback) like we do for exclude_kernel.
> 
>>
>> Because in record the addresses of guest samples don't make sense without
>> extra work, but for stat you might want to see an overview of the whole
>> system.
> 
> I think it depends on the use case and (power) users should know about
> their environment and requirement.  The concern is what's the reasonable
> default, but I think it should be the same both in perf record and stat
> at least.
> 
>>
>> For Coresight tracing and SPE we would want to keep exclude_guest, otherwise
>> you generate a load of extra trace that you can't make use of. Say you were
>> doing PGO on your host you wouldn't be recompiling anything the guests were
>> running.
> 
> For the specific use case, I think we can guide users to add "H"
> modifier (I guess it's not the default event for perf record).
> Maybe we can consider per-PMU default attributes.
> 

Yeah I was thinking about adding it as a default when the Coresight and 
SPE events are configured, but I think it's too much to expect for 
people to know all the edge cases about what the per PMU defaults will 
be. Having one default for all PMUs makes more sense to me.

I suppose asking Coresight users to add :H when they need it might be a 
less bad thing than this change to clean up the fragmentation in the 
defaults.

I expect most of the time if :H is not added things continue to work, 
just that more data will be recorded. One real concern is that in some 
configurations there is a limited buffer size and once it's filled you 
don't get any more data. If that buffer is filled by guest trace then 
maybe some Auto FDO flow could break. But it's kind of an edge case of 
an edge case and adding :H isn't really the end of the world.

>>
>> If we do change the defaults isn't ':H' already enough to go back to the old
>> behavior? I'm wondering why we need an argument when all the other exclude
>> rules are done with the letter modifiers?
> 
> I'm not sure I follow this.  But maybe we don't need this option at all.
> We can add ":H" for every event but I'm too lazy to add them to all the
> default events in perf data. :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>   

Oh I see yes, the argument is a shortcut to adding H on all events 
and/or the default ones. I wasn't sure if was added because it couldn't 
be done with :H, but I see it's an alternative instead. So adding it 
makes sense.

>>>> +
>>>>    STAT RECORD
>>>>    -----------
>>>>    Stores stat data into perf data file.
>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>>>> index d8315dae930184ba..4d47675af5cc3094 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>>>> @@ -2491,6 +2491,8 @@ int cmd_stat(int argc, const char **argv)
>>>>    		OPT_BOOLEAN_FLAG(0, "all-user", &stat_config.all_user,
>>>>    				"Configure all used events to run in user space.",
>>>>    				PARSE_OPT_EXCLUSIVE),
>>>> +		OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "exclude-guest", &exclude_HG_default,
>>>> +			"Don't count events in the guest mode"),

Maybe this would be a good hint if it really is equivalent:

  +	"Don't count events in the guest mode. (Add :H to all events)"),

>>>>    		OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "percore-show-thread", &stat_config.percore_show_thread,
>>>>    			"Use with 'percore' event qualifier to show the event "
>>>>    			"counts of one hardware thread by sum up total hardware "
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-25  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-05 20:24 [RFC/PATCHSET 00/10] perf tools: Do not set attr.exclude_guest by default (v3) Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf tools: Add fallback for exclude_guest Namhyung Kim
2024-09-06 13:47   ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-30 20:36     ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] perf tools: Don't set attr.exclude_guest by default Namhyung Kim
2024-09-06 14:10   ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] perf tools: Simplify evsel__add_modifier() Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] perf stat: Add --exclude-guest option Namhyung Kim
2024-09-06 14:33   ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-23  8:47     ` James Clark
2024-09-24 20:21       ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-25  8:36         ` James Clark [this message]
2024-09-30 20:13           ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-25 13:49         ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-30 20:07           ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] perf tools: Do not set exclude_guest for precise_ip Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] perf tools: Detect missing kernel features properly Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 07/10] perf tools: Separate exclude_hv fallback Namhyung Kim
2024-09-06 15:21   ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-30 20:37     ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf tools: Move x86__is_amd_cpu() to util/env.c Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] perf tools: Check fallback error and order Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] perf record: Just use "cycles:P" as the default event Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f436dc23-bcaf-493b-93a9-699b63a18d46@linaro.org \
    --to=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®