From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>,
"Pradhan, Sanman" <sanman.pradhan@hpe.com>,
"linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Michael.Hennerich@analog.com" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"beniamin.bia@analog.com" <beniamin.bia@analog.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sanman Pradhan <psanman@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: adm1177: fix sysfs ABI violation and current unit conversion
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 06:46:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f460f5cb-ff67-4644-9bb1-db772ff60b70@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7069532401720fda1ca6e70b72742526fc79dec.camel@gmail.com>
On 3/25/26 03:37, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-03-24 at 18:22 +0000, Pradhan, Sanman wrote:
>> From: Sanman Pradhan <psanman@juniper.net>
>>
>> The adm1177 driver exposes the current alert threshold using
>> hwmon_curr_max_alarm. Per the hwmon sysfs ABI, *_alarm attributes
>> are read-only status flags; the writable threshold should use
>> hwmon_curr_max instead.
>>
>> Additionally, the threshold is stored internally in microamps
>> (alert_threshold_ua) but the ABI requires milliamps for currN_max.
>> Convert appropriately on both the read and write paths, and
>> propagate the return value of adm1177_write_alert_thr() which was
>> previously discarded.
>>
>> Clamp write values to the range the hardware can represent rather
>> than rejecting out-of-range input, and use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST on the
>> read path to minimise rounding error during the uA-to-mA conversion.
>>
>> Fixes: 09b08ac9e8d5 ("hwmon: (adm1177) Add ADM1177 Hot Swap Controller and Digital Power Monitor
>> driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Sanman Pradhan <psanman@juniper.net>
>> ---
>
> For the AI comment, typically these applications don't go to ohms for rsense so, in practice, it
Limiting rsense to a reasonable value (1 Ohm might do)might just be good enough.
That is really unrelated to this change, so it should be a separate patch.
> might be that we never get he overflow. But I would still play safe given it's so trivial. I also
> see you only replace hwmon_curr_max_alarm with hwmon_curr_max. It would be nicer to first fix ABI
> and then support hwmon_curr_max_alarm (properly). Though might be a big ask if you don't have HW to
> test it. Anyways, after AI feedback addressed:
Ah yes, good point. The chip _does_ support actual alerts, so that would be desirable.
However, that should also be a separate patch and, yes, it would be better to have an
actual chip at hand to make sure that it works as intended.
I'll apply this patch as-is.
Thanks,
Guenter
>
> Acked-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
>
>> drivers/hwmon/adm1177.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/adm1177.c b/drivers/hwmon/adm1177.c
>> index 8b2c965480e3f..8742b8b5314b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/adm1177.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/adm1177.c
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>> #include <linux/hwmon.h>
>> #include <linux/i2c.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/minmax.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>
>> @@ -91,8 +92,8 @@ static int adm1177_read(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
>> *val = div_u64((105840000ull * dummy),
>> 4096 * st->r_sense_uohm);
>> return 0;
>> - case hwmon_curr_max_alarm:
>> - *val = st->alert_threshold_ua;
>> + case hwmon_curr_max:
>> + *val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(st->alert_threshold_ua, 1000);
>> return 0;
>> default:
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> @@ -126,9 +127,10 @@ static int adm1177_write(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
>> switch (type) {
>> case hwmon_curr:
>> switch (attr) {
>> - case hwmon_curr_max_alarm:
>> - adm1177_write_alert_thr(st, val);
>> - return 0;
>> + case hwmon_curr_max:
>> + val = clamp_val(val, 0,
>> + div_u64(105840000ULL, st->r_sense_uohm));
>> + return adm1177_write_alert_thr(st, val * 1000);
>> default:
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>> @@ -156,7 +158,7 @@ static umode_t adm1177_is_visible(const void *data,
>> if (st->r_sense_uohm)
>> return 0444;
>> return 0;
>> - case hwmon_curr_max_alarm:
>> + case hwmon_curr_max:
>> if (st->r_sense_uohm)
>> return 0644;
>> return 0;
>> @@ -170,7 +172,7 @@ static umode_t adm1177_is_visible(const void *data,
>>
>> static const struct hwmon_channel_info * const adm1177_info[] = {
>> HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(curr,
>> - HWMON_C_INPUT | HWMON_C_MAX_ALARM),
>> + HWMON_C_INPUT | HWMON_C_MAX),
>> HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(in,
>> HWMON_I_INPUT),
>> NULL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-25 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 18:22 Pradhan, Sanman
2026-03-24 20:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-03-25 10:37 ` Nuno Sá
2026-03-25 13:46 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2026-03-25 13:50 ` Nuno Sá
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f460f5cb-ff67-4644-9bb1-db772ff60b70@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=beniamin.bia@analog.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=psanman@juniper.net \
--cc=sanman.pradhan@hpe.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®