From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@gmail.com,
npiggin@gmail.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/mm: page fault handler cleaning
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:30:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4693d88-9142-dfd5-4182-9921e67c1c2c@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1487090656.git.ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Kindly ping...
On 14/02/2017 17:45, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> This series attempts to clean the page fault handler in the way it has
> been done previously for the x86 architecture [1].
>
> The goal is to manage the mmap_sem earlier and only in
> do_page_fault(). This done by handling the retry case earlier, before
> handling the error case. This way the semaphore can be released
> earlier and the error path processed without holding it.
>
> The first patch is just moving a unlock to the caller of the service,
> which as no functional impact.
>
> The second patch is handling the retry case earlier in
> do_page_fault(). This is where most the change are done, but I was
> conservative here, not changing the use of mm_fault_error() in the
> case of the second retry. It may be smarter to handle that case
> separately but this may create duplicate code.
>
> The last patch is moving up semaphore releasing from mm_fault_error()
> to do_page_fault().
>
> [1] see commits from Linus Torvalds
> 26178ec11ef3 ("x86: mm: consolidate VM_FAULT_RETRY handling")
> 7fb08eca4527 ("x86: mm: move mmap_sem unlock from mm_fault_error() to
> caller")
>
> Laurent Dufour (3):
> powerpc/mm: move mmap_sem unlock up from do_sigbus
> powerpc/mm: handle VM_FAULT_RETRY earlier
> powerpc/mm: move mmap_sem unlocking in do_page_fault()
>
> arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-14 16:45 Laurent Dufour
2017-02-14 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/mm: move mmap_sem unlock up from do_sigbus Laurent Dufour
2017-03-21 8:39 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-03-21 11:36 ` [1/3] " Michael Ellerman
2017-02-14 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/mm: handle VM_FAULT_RETRY earlier Laurent Dufour
2017-03-21 9:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-03-21 9:57 ` Laurent Dufour
2017-02-14 16:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/mm: move mmap_sem unlocking in do_page_fault() Laurent Dufour
2017-03-21 9:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-03-02 12:30 ` Laurent Dufour [this message]
2017-03-03 12:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/mm: page fault handler cleaning Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f4693d88-9142-dfd5-4182-9921e67c1c2c@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®