From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794668063; b=AleSLr2s8u8tKcc7AcW01EGyk+VMRmYAiwxNOp+Mq9eJ3IO5hZ8muHThAmDmXMr7Oao/ rR1NaUhXmpN4yqtgprEnx3mOUIXayvjdzrc5DXzujeTaCXQzV9wue7KozQBJQuuPQf412 yPeRmtGKvTFfvUMM8qG2xCneQW1kGtP6wkhDQLcFM/NRFabGcs74MeEgaiOSVAhHgTh3M EovgXfUg/ym4Qy918JIFhNaVO2ycnKVpOxdDS4e2Krxwh3yKyO6xbmg22BJL9+mbTg7vj Xwn9+poybO51Bb+zTnCoI+lgzB68PucBU/Sv4YL5sIiJXJPW882CUmtFNGEc5p0ZsqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794668063; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To; bh=kgDRQFvvfjQZkPMqc9sNVxcY05Fagrbh4c9pSkoSO9I=; b=eibhdGEovxg6lWEHnV6qY+pjLpSHb/gdrDbmASShx1UNhizkY+JMyJTKJrR4q4r6yagL cS2KA9H2yyyqYj85ejOxMKY0PRl9CSrLL2udOCjN4hT0ayoXrl4g3dA2z+5VD98YdGb5S 0/90uY7Hd5H2Q3icwdXZ2kZF/TS8Yn6Lv0PdMBPdhMtR8TRLIfjXVPOg8TGr5yJI5hJOm bVKcofDeEdJ07IipQED6WGT8pHYfx0v8DFS6qeiwvkPTjDnSIrlBbcTwGJ2ttAKWAuzqe aGOnVqn9O6cVzZN89BmZTAWkdwjDJp7erVO0GurpDIY3sb88jKbX6aNoernNLy2d4hw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20171124 header.b=FeuXP+eq; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=156.67.10.101 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E447606A323; Sat, 14 Nov 2026 14:54:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 1E447606A323 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20171124 header.b=FeuXP+eq DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=kgDRQFvvfjQZkPMqc9sNVxcY05Fagrbh4c9pSkoSO9I=; b=FeuXP+eqev/PzBKpj9mW8d8W2x eE8bX262SZsAL7oYIZDoFl3Zd/rYunoXDBny8KscRvGel99rtMr9g+dznWsWh/avO7t0kC3CKdfmb HZSNMKG1zZuBQ9+/XwGvfcXEqQqWcT7yaZ5FkvGIoRzVLzgkYKeI7w9X4AvB44kwX8Wg=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xSF8l-00GVVx-5i; Sat, 14 Nov 2026 15:54:03 +0100 Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 15:54:03 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org Cc: s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, afd@ti.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, michal.simek@amd.com, edumazet@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: phy: dp83867: support setting output-impedance Message-ID: References: <20261110-v7-2-topic-dp83867-v4-4-a268f83b1ec1@pengutronix.de> <179465553811.2199510.12732274072788992215@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <179465553811.2199510.12732274072788992215@kernel.org> > Would a raw register code property work better here? That goes against DT best practices. > Another option would > be to document the ohm value as approximate This seems more reasonable. Andrew