From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755578AbYIJVUL (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:20:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752765AbYIJVT7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:19:59 -0400 Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.204.225]:28542 "EHLO qb-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751232AbYIJVT6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:19:58 -0400 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:19:56 -0700 From: "Steven Noonan" To: "Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/ide/ide-probe.c: uninitialized variable 'rc' Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu In-Reply-To: <200809102309.34159.bzolnier@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1220994461-15962-1-git-send-email-steven@uplinklabs.net> <200809102309.34159.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > I recall seeing identical patch before: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/33107 > > Does the existing code really results in gcc warning? > > Yes, because GCC thinks it's possible that the for loop has zero iterations (and hence, 'rc' is never touched). - Steven