From: Neil Leeder <nleeder@codeaurora.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
cov@codeaurora.org, ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org,
sboyd@codeaurora.org, nleeder@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: provide mechanism for drivers to access L2 registers
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 14:22:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f49d58ed-38b4-6284-11c2-8708d8443b14@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160523172527.GK4976@leverpostej>
On 5/23/2016 01:25 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 03:13:07PM -0400, Neil Leeder wrote:
>> L2 registers are accessed using a select register and data
>> register pair. To prevent multiple concurrent writes to the
>> select register by independent drivers, the write to the
>> select register and the associated access of the data register
>> are protected with a lock. All drivers accessing the L2
>> registers use the set and get functions provided by
>> l2-accessors to ensure correct reads and writes to L2 registers.
>
> What will this be used for? (i.e. which drivers want to touch the L2
> registers?).
>
> Generally we expect FW to configure the caches and interconnect
> appropriately.
The primary use is in the L2 PMU driver, which will be posted shortly.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Leeder <nleeder@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 9 +++++
>> drivers/soc/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/soc/qcom/l2-accessors.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/soc/qcom/l2-accessors.h | 27 ++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/qcom/l2-accessors.c
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/soc/qcom/l2-accessors.h
>
> These are awfully generic file names (and function names). Which SoCs
> does this apply to?
>
> It would be good to give these more specific names.
It's under soc/qcom, and dependent on ARCH_QCOM and (in v2) also on ARM64. It applies to all QCOM ARM64 SoCs.
Given that it can only be used in a QCOM driver, and the include path has qcom in it, I'd
prefer not to add redundancy by adding another qcom in there.
>> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/qcom/l2-accessors.h b/include/linux/soc/qcom/l2-accessors.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..563c114
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/linux/soc/qcom/l2-accessors.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2011-2016 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
>> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>
>> +#ifndef __QCOM_L2_ACCESSORS_H
>> +#define __QCOM_L2_ACCESSORS_H
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_QCOM_L2_ACCESSORS
>> +void set_l2_indirect_reg(u64 reg_addr, u64 val);
>> +u64 get_l2_indirect_reg(u64 reg_addr);
>> +#else
>> +static inline void set_l2_indirect_reg(u64 reg_addr, u64 val) {}
>> +static inline u64 get_l2_indirect_reg(u64 reg_addr)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> Surely it would be better to error out on any unintentional use of these
> at build time?
This allows building code which is common to ARM SoCs and QCOM SoCs without having to ifdef out the
QCOM-specific pieces.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
Thanks,
Neil
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-23 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-20 19:13 Neil Leeder
2016-05-20 21:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-05-23 15:43 ` Neil Leeder
2016-05-23 17:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-05-23 18:12 ` Neil Leeder
2016-05-23 17:25 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-23 18:22 ` Neil Leeder [this message]
2016-05-23 22:26 ` Christopher Covington
2016-05-23 23:04 ` Timur Tabi
2016-05-24 11:23 ` Mark Rutland
2016-05-24 19:54 ` Neil Leeder
2016-05-26 4:48 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-05-26 20:38 ` Neil Leeder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f49d58ed-38b4-6284-11c2-8708d8443b14@codeaurora.org \
--to=nleeder@codeaurora.org \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mlangsdo@redhat.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome