mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
	kaber@trash.net, samanthakumar@google.com, willemb@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Select hang with zero sized UDP packets
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:06:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4d8b317-72bd-382d-f758-5fa997f1637b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471979019.14381.37.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>

On 08/23/2016 12:03 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 11:25 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:53:26 -0700
>>
>>> Fedora received a report[1] of a unit test failing on Ruby when using
>>> the
>>> 4.7 kernel. This was a test to send a zero sized UDP packet. With the
>>> 4.7 kernel, the test now timing out on a select instead of completing.
>>> The reduced ruby test is
>>>
>>>   def test_udp_recvfrom_nonblock
>>>     u1 = UDPSocket.new
>>>     u2 = UDPSocket.new
>>>     u1.bind("127.0.0.1", 0)
>>>     u2.send("", 0, u1.getsockname)
>>>     IO.select [u1]  # test gets stuck here
>>>   ensure
>>>     u1.close if u1
>>>     u2.close if u2
>>>   end
>>
>> Well, if there is no data, should select really wake up?
>>
>> I think it's valid not to.
> There are skb in receive queue, with skb->len = 0
>
> This looks like a bug in first_packet_length() or poll logic.
>
> Definitely something we can fix.
>
> Maybe with :
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index e61f7cd65d08..380c05a84041 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -1184,11 +1184,11 @@ out:
>   *	Drops all bad checksum frames, until a valid one is found.
>   *	Returns the length of found skb, or 0 if none is found.
>   */
> -static unsigned int first_packet_length(struct sock *sk)
> +static int first_packet_length(struct sock *sk)
>  {
>  	struct sk_buff_head list_kill, *rcvq = &sk->sk_receive_queue;
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
> -	unsigned int res;
> +	int res;
>
>  	__skb_queue_head_init(&list_kill);
>
> @@ -1203,7 +1203,7 @@ static unsigned int first_packet_length(struct sock *sk)
>  		__skb_unlink(skb, rcvq);
>  		__skb_queue_tail(&list_kill, skb);
>  	}
> -	res = skb ? skb->len : 0;
> +	res = skb ? skb->len : -1;
>  	spin_unlock_bh(&rcvq->lock);
>
>  	if (!skb_queue_empty(&list_kill)) {
> @@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ int udp_ioctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>
>  	case SIOCINQ:
>  	{
> -		unsigned int amount = first_packet_length(sk);
> +		int amount = max(0, first_packet_length(sk));
>
>  		return put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg);
>  	}
> @@ -2184,7 +2184,7 @@ unsigned int udp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait)
>
>  	/* Check for false positives due to checksum errors */
>  	if ((mask & POLLRDNORM) && !(file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) &&
> -	    !(sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) && !first_packet_length(sk))
> +	    !(sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) && first_packet_length(sk) == -1)
>  		mask &= ~(POLLIN | POLLRDNORM);
>
>  	return mask;
>
>

Fixes the test for me. You're welcome to take this as a Tested-by.

Thanks,
Laura

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-23 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-23 17:53 Laura Abbott
2016-08-23 18:25 ` David Miller
2016-08-23 19:03   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-23 20:06     ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2016-08-23 20:42       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-24  8:22   ` Dan Akunis
2016-08-24 13:02     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-24 13:42     ` One Thousand Gnomes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f4d8b317-72bd-382d-f758-5fa997f1637b@redhat.com \
    --to=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=samanthakumar@google.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®