From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0688C4CECE for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C26520650 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730500AbfJNIiD (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 04:38:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54414 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730439AbfJNIiD (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 04:38:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5F6373A60 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id p8so3887082wrj.8 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 01:38:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+0+jYoRl9oEFQs2yc70KUPcvIdquCCUud08IyDTa0Sk=; b=KZ5IvvhkD0wIA7uoRIgl1yvtVQQBHSEetv5+pHzhfFp0JX1soki/R50hoz+pfyAb/x jp2+nH7LYtlBl3ntm78AD+r9cN3G2uYF16zBN4tRRjwoTea8zHKdZMjBl2ua5Ykur1RX QqFVMWAVH8lDQ/kS21DNeWA6whCAg20az9eDszKewu1tZkukGCMk4NzRc+9dh3D4OFcq b61A7dzFdABMTepnr4jSBK2z1xAsqleedm0L1LPwnSwgVz1aLg1Z/PmEjfpmOf8UarIW 0hp+G9+8rgoGijLmGJTcibzO6nqruR8W16J7cbII/iq/ohpgJWA/L/6pJDoA50rpuxCc BM2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWU/E6m2oN+knA2sYSVsxcFy/DYXst2n+0n7lmBSU6NOD+v0kTY c/y+Z4huOZ3AgYkK5gRwrJZAeeR7ykFVbtZZd4VQCpgsWwEDPI76CLcuVlqsSlsZbVlco9CA/dw hHEue1S6H3xE+LCLDPuolApe0 X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef83:: with SMTP id d3mr24269920wro.398.1571042281413; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 01:38:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx1Z5KT0VRMmx0ICRJQ57vVQt4XOO7A3AyHOiVUdwcd70YI9rxvp4vdD5PKGwKw9pM+rhgrew== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef83:: with SMTP id d3mr24269904wro.398.1571042281249; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 01:38:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.81] (host81-157-241-145.range81-157.btcentralplus.com. [81.157.241.145]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm22878762wrt.75.2019.10.14.01.37.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 01:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC v4 00/18] objtool: Add support for arm64 To: Raphael Gault , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, raph.gault+kdev@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com References: <20190816122403.14994-1-raphael.gault@arm.com> From: Julien Thierry Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:37:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190816122403.14994-1-raphael.gault@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 8/16/19 1:23 PM, Raphael Gault wrote: > Hi, > [...] > As of now, objtool only supports the x86_64 architecture but the > groundwork has already been done in order to add support for other > architectures without too much effort. > > This series of patches adds support for the arm64 architecture > based on the Armv8.5 Architecture Reference Manual. > I was wondering about the current status of these patches. Is anyone actively working on this? If not, I can pick that up and try to make this go forward. Cheers, -- Julien Thierry