From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
To: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@linux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC RFT] drm/msm: adreno: attach the GMU device to a driver
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 09:38:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5041496-ee83-479a-995f-79b6952bcafe@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8058713-b126-461b-8ae6-19c4574a8105@oss.qualcomm.com>
Hi,
On 10/30/25 22:29, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On 10/22/2025 6:14 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Due to the sync_state is enabled by default in pmdomain & CCF since v6.17,
>> the GCC and GPUCC sync_state would stay pending, leaving the resources in
>> full performance:
>> gcc-x1e80100 100000.clock-controller: sync_state() pending due to 3d6a000.gmu
>> gpucc-x1e80100 3d90000.clock-controller: sync_state() pending due to 3d6a000.gmu
>>
>> In order to fix this state and allow the GMU to be properly
>> probed, let's add a proper driver for the GMU and add it to
>> the MSM driver components.
>>
>> Only the proper GMU has been tested since I don't have
>> access to hardware with a GMU wrapper.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 354 ++++++++++++++---------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 6 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h | 3 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 4 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h | 4 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 16 +-
>> 6 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 195 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> index fc62fef2fed8..6e7c3e627509 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> @@ -1859,11 +1859,14 @@ void a6xx_gmu_sysprof_setup(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>> pm_runtime_put(&gpu->pdev->dev);
>> }
>>
>> -void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu)
>> +static void a6xx_gmu_unbind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>> {
>
> I feel we should keep gmu and gmu_wrapper implementations separate. It
> is already overloaded. How about adding a separate gmu_wrapper_bind_ops
> and keep it in the match data?
Good idea, will try something like that.
>
>> - struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = &a6xx_gpu->base;
>> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>> + struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev_get_drvdata(master);
>> + struct msm_gpu *gpu = priv->gpu;
>
> << snip >>
>
>> static inline uint32_t get_wptr(struct msm_ringbuffer *ring)
>> {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
>> index 7e977fec4100..0618da7e8b40 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
>> @@ -998,18 +998,30 @@ static const struct of_device_id msm_gpu_match[] = {
>> { },
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct of_device_id msm_gmu_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,adreno-gmu" },
>> + { .compatible = "qcom,adreno-gmu-wrapper" },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +
>> static int add_gpu_components(struct device *dev,
>> struct component_match **matchptr)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *np;
>> + struct device_node *np, *gmu;
>>
>> np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, msm_gpu_match);
>> if (!np)
>> return 0;
>>
>> - if (of_device_is_available(np) && adreno_has_gpu(np))
>> + if (of_device_is_available(np) && adreno_has_gpu(np)) {
>> drm_of_component_match_add(dev, matchptr, component_compare_of, np);
>>
>> + gmu = of_find_matching_node(NULL, msm_gmu_match);
>
> Instead of this, we can probably use the gmu phandle from "qcom,gmu"
> property? That is quicker and also doesn't assume that there is only a
> single GPU.
Ack you're right, let's do this since we have the GPU node already.
>
>> + if (of_device_is_available(gmu))
>> + drm_of_component_match_add(dev, matchptr, component_compare_of, gmu);
>> + of_node_put(gmu);
> I think you missed the recently added headless support. Please check
> separate_gpu_kms modparam and msm_gpu_probe().
I saw it but seems I probably forgot the check if it's still functional,
will double check.
Thanks,
Neil
>
> -Akhil
>
>> + }
>> +
>> of_node_put(np);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 211ddde0823f1442e4ad052a2f30f050145ccada
>> change-id: 20251022-topic-adreno-attach-gmu-to-driver-e47025fd7ebb
>>
>> Best regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-31 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-22 12:44 Neil Armstrong
2025-10-22 17:09 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-10-23 8:27 ` Neil Armstrong
2025-10-24 8:55 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-10-24 9:11 ` Neil Armstrong
2025-10-30 9:52 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-10-30 10:02 ` Neil Armstrong
2025-10-26 1:31 ` Jens Reidel
2025-10-29 10:25 ` Neil Armstrong
2025-11-04 1:30 ` Jens Reidel
2025-11-04 12:43 ` Neil Armstrong
2025-10-30 21:29 ` Akhil P Oommen
2025-10-31 8:38 ` Neil Armstrong [this message]
2026-01-14 6:37 ` Akhil P Oommen
2026-01-14 8:45 ` Neil Armstrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f5041496-ee83-479a-995f-79b6952bcafe@linaro.org \
--to=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=abhinav.kumar@linux.dev \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akhilpo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®