From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A1EE28366; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 21:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711574703; cv=none; b=TPK0Rh41mZSPMxaMkKysvJ3Yv2ho+NWtkQaAHCZHsnT7Bgp5P2met0rnPJoFzATIfv1nq0JQs/HVevaJkqEKkcImtnUwGKvoCErlPup5GUwv3CRfI2Euim6WSgJgK4RUjzBZZRWdJc7b93fAUMkUFr8nKkMYJ7YHlyvaZgP1MHs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711574703; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fMWyR4T8HDfiXSrxNx4i4P75j10VLhztLf65/nEwedA=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=L2oUVuHnGjGROlR/MAagYXGvgnzy1e+10LZTvbJldYODhKEiAoCynqJQTTaOeHybA60wZMK4cYJ4e6eIfnsy/8fx7spKOJVp5IRSYfNIgL45Wjo+OAZlkpGSdmiGPY9jQpsjEXwHmCA4jGCdb8f76gHiA1flYsrLu2jY2azg2ac= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=eGdUKc52; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="eGdUKc52" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=fMWyR4T8HDfiXSrxNx4i4P75j10VLhztLf65/nEwedA=; t=1711574701; x=1712784301; b=eGdUKc529jKPvDJpYhuu7ujqZgD6Oonudp6XU+ZXie5k5Kl t1yt7HVoL2GI0EkL5RoIFxRk1OTrsYmq+EoBKw/4IrNVypqQXexG8ViH/wah4QFL9PEt0h1FLko4O 5IT65arrJXuxoytyg2iPlraYHeRIX9HuTzz6JYApJnEwsMUwv00TqB6r/Jkf6q7QbNFqjfih4/NAX 3cLrT4qjHTVJDCViq768HhjYQpDAfcxU6HxKwB7TgaW4kK7QHQlXWzrNsBMsMEVCbNroufKTFT8HJ nHiUaAl2zkl1IpDMy0YFK+1dPvJ5vge2KgUGWbaThIrp44woFAWfzaUSpcRrLxUA==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rpalV-0000000HOpZ-2XGl; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:24:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] tracing: add __print_sym() to replace __print_symbolic() From: Johannes Berg To: Simon Horman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:24:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20240327211119.GW403975@kernel.org> References: <20240326192131.438648-6-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <20240326202131.9d261d5bb667.I9bd2617499f0d170df58471bc51379742190f92d@changeid> <20240327211119.GW403975@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.4 (3.50.4-1.fc39) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 21:11 +0000, Simon Horman wrote: >=20 > I'm seeing some allmodconfig build problems with this applied on top of > net-next. > ./include/trace/stages/init.h:30: warning: "TRACE_DEFINE_SYM_FNS" redefin= ed > ./include/trace/stages/init.h:54: warning: "TRACE_DEFINE_SYM_LIST" redefi= ned Yeah, the 0-day bot reported that too, sorry about that. It needs two lines to #undef these in init.h before their definition, just like all other macros there. Not sure why my builds didn't show that, maybe it doesn't affect all users. johannes