From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751505AbdGRP0E (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:26:04 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:5654 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751430AbdGRP0D (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:26:03 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,378,1496127600"; d="scan'208";a="880118026" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4]: perf/core: complete replace of lists by rb trees for pinned and flexible groups at perf_event_context To: Alexander Shishkin , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Andi Kleen , Kan Liang , Dmitri Prokhorov , Valery Cherepennikov , Mark Rutland , David Carrillo-Cisneros , Stephane Eranian , linux-kernel References: <33f0e89c-9252-c154-cd11-5f4dd06bdb3a@linux.intel.com> <87h8yavv20.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> <87vampvo82.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> <43f69bfc-25b4-9bee-5b25-90d73ec61041@linux.intel.com> <87shhtvl2y.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> From: Alexey Budankov Organization: Intel Corp. Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:25:58 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87shhtvl2y.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 18.07.2017 18:08, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Alexey Budankov writes: > >> Ok. I see. So what are the next steps needs to be taken towards the upstream of this work? >> What do I need to do more to have this stuff included into the kernel? >> Could you please clarify this? > > Well, normally you'd be sending new versions of your patchset until the > maintainers are happy with it, at which point they'd pick it up. New > versions would address the issues pointed out during the review, also > keeping in mind the what 'submitting-patches' says about submitting > patches. I see. Do you personally have some more issues that needs to be addressed? My intention is that this patch v5 4/4 addresses all your comments raised in the previous reviews. > > Regards, > -- > Alex > Thanks, Alexey