From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com, yf.wang@mediatek.com,
libo.kang@mediatek.com, chengci.xu@mediatek.com,
youlin.pei@mediatek.com, anan.sun@mediatek.com,
xueqi.zhang@mediatek.com, Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/6] iommu/mediatek: Improve safety for mediatek,smi property in larb nodes
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:49:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f51c7f56-4c62-0351-3b01-ae2f6432fb05@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221018024258.19073-6-yong.wu@mediatek.com>
On 18/10/2022 04:42, Yong Wu wrote:
> No functional change. Just improve safety from dts.
>
> All the larbs that connect to one IOMMU must connect with the same
> smi-common. This patch checks all the mediatek,smi property for each
> larb, If their mediatek,smi are different, it will return fails.
> Also avoid there is no available smi-larb nodes.
>
> Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 9cbff48f03c0..f7ac102e343f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -1042,7 +1042,7 @@ static const struct component_master_ops mtk_iommu_com_ops = {
> static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **match,
> struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
> {
> - struct device_node *larbnode, *smicomm_node, *smi_subcomm_node;
> + struct device_node *larbnode, *frst_avail_smicomm_node = NULL;
> struct platform_device *plarbdev, *pcommdev;
> struct device_link *link;
> int i, larb_nr, ret;
> @@ -1054,6 +1054,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
> return -EINVAL;
>
> for (i = 0; i < larb_nr; i++) {
> + struct device_node *smicomm_node, *smi_subcomm_node;
> u32 id;
>
> larbnode = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "mediatek,larbs", i);
> @@ -1094,27 +1095,47 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct device *dev, struct component_match **m
> goto err_larbdev_put;
> }
>
> + /* Get smi-(sub)-common dev from the last larb. */
> + smi_subcomm_node = of_parse_phandle(larbnode, "mediatek,smi", 0);
> + if (!smi_subcomm_node) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * It may have two level smi-common. the node is smi-sub-common if it
> + * has a new mediatek,smi property. otherwise it is smi-commmon.
> + */
> + smicomm_node = of_parse_phandle(smi_subcomm_node, "mediatek,smi", 0);
> + if (smicomm_node)
> + of_node_put(smi_subcomm_node);
> + else
> + smicomm_node = smi_subcomm_node;
> +
> + /*
> + * All the larbs that connect to one IOMMU must connect with the same
> + * smi-common.
> + */
> + if (!frst_avail_smicomm_node) {
> + frst_avail_smicomm_node = smicomm_node;
> + } else if (frst_avail_smicomm_node != smicomm_node) {
> + dev_err(dev, "mediatek,smi property is not right @larb%d.", id);
> + of_node_put(smicomm_node);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_larbdev_put;
> + } else {
> + of_node_put(smicomm_node);
> + }
> +
> component_match_add(dev, match, component_compare_dev, &plarbdev->dev);
> platform_device_put(plarbdev);
> }
>
> - /* Get smi-(sub)-common dev from the last larb. */
> - smi_subcomm_node = of_parse_phandle(larbnode, "mediatek,smi", 0);
> - if (!smi_subcomm_node)
> + if (!frst_avail_smicomm_node)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - /*
> - * It may have two level smi-common. the node is smi-sub-common if it
> - * has a new mediatek,smi property. otherwise it is smi-commmon.
> - */
> - smicomm_node = of_parse_phandle(smi_subcomm_node, "mediatek,smi", 0);
> - if (smicomm_node)
> - of_node_put(smi_subcomm_node);
> - else
> - smicomm_node = smi_subcomm_node;
> -
> - pcommdev = of_find_device_by_node(smicomm_node);
> - of_node_put(smicomm_node);
> + pcommdev = of_find_device_by_node(frst_avail_smicomm_node);
> + of_node_put(frst_avail_smicomm_node);
> if (!pcommdev)
> return -ENODEV;
> data->smicomm_dev = &pcommdev->dev;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 2:42 [PATCH v7 0/6] iommu/mediatek: Improve safety from invalid dts input Yong Wu
2022-10-18 2:42 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] iommu/mediatek: Add platform_device_put for recovering the device refcnt Yong Wu
2022-11-22 16:24 ` Matthias Brugger
2022-10-18 2:42 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] iommu/mediatek: Use component_match_add Yong Wu
2022-11-22 16:28 ` Matthias Brugger
2022-10-18 2:42 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] iommu/mediatek: Add error path for loop of mm_dts_parse Yong Wu
2022-11-22 16:32 ` Matthias Brugger
2022-10-18 2:42 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] iommu/mediatek: Validate number of phandles associated with "mediatek,larbs" Yong Wu
2022-11-22 16:43 ` Matthias Brugger
2022-10-18 2:42 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] iommu/mediatek: Improve safety for mediatek,smi property in larb nodes Yong Wu
2022-11-22 16:49 ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2022-10-18 2:42 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] iommu/mediatek: Remove unused "mapping" member from mtk_iommu_data Yong Wu
2022-11-22 1:13 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] iommu/mediatek: Improve safety from invalid dts input Yong Wu (吴勇)
2022-11-22 8:30 ` joro
2022-12-05 10:46 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f51c7f56-4c62-0351-3b01-ae2f6432fb05@gmail.com \
--to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=anan.sun@mediatek.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=chengci.xu@mediatek.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=libo.kang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueqi.zhang@mediatek.com \
--cc=yf.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®