From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>,
Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
R Nageswara Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: PPC: Fix get_d_signext() 12-bit displacement for paired-single D-form
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 08:57:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5243a5c-a611-43a8-8350-7418b0dfd864@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930173750.56759-4-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
On 9/30/26 11:07 PM, Amit Machhiwal wrote:
> get_d_signext() has two compounding bugs since its introduction in 2010:
>
> 1. The extraction mask 0x8FF silently drops bits 8-10 of the 12-bit D
> field (PPC ISA bits 21-23), corrupting any displacement that has any
> of those bits set.
>
> 2. The sign-magnitude idiom "-(d & 0x7ff)" is wrong for two's-complement:
> for D=0xFFC (encoding of -4) it returns -252 instead of -4.
>
> Together these errors produce a wrong effective address for psq_l, psq_lu,
> psq_st, and psq_stu whenever the displacement is negative or is a positive
> value >= 0x100 with bits 8-10 set — essentially any real-world paired-
> single stack-relative access.
>
> The D field occupies the bottom 12 bits of the instruction word (confirmed
> by the adjacent W and I extractions via inst_get_field(inst,16,16) and
> inst_get_field(inst,17,19)). Replace the open-coded logic with the standard
> sign_extend32(inst & 0xfff, 11), which correctly performs two's-complement
> sign extension from 12 bits to 32 bits.
>
> Fixes: 831317b605e7 ("KVM: PPC: Implement Paired Single emulation")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c
> index bc39c76c9d9f..532f96293de0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c
> @@ -479,12 +479,7 @@ static bool kvmppc_inst_is_paired_single(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 inst)
>
> static int get_d_signext(u32 inst)
> {
> - int d = inst & 0x8ff;
> -
> - if (d & 0x800)
> - return -(d & 0x7ff);
> -
> - return (d & 0x7ff);
> + return sign_extend32(inst & 0xfff, 11);
> }
>
> static int kvmppc_ps_three_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool rc,
If the intent was just to get the signed value based on bit11 (0 based index)
then patch looks right.
Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 17:37 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: PPC: Fixes for Book3S HV HPT locking and paired-single decoding Amit Machhiwal
2026-09-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add SRCU protection for virtual-mode HPT hcalls Amit Machhiwal
2026-09-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add preempt_disable() around virtual-mode HPTE bit-lock users Amit Machhiwal
2026-10-05 14:28 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-10-05 18:27 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-10-06 3:01 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-09-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: PPC: Fix get_d_signext() 12-bit displacement for paired-single D-form Amit Machhiwal
2026-10-06 3:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f5243a5c-a611-43a8-8350-7418b0dfd864@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rnsastry@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®