Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Add ti,am62l3 to blocklist

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 16/01/2026 11:06, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2026 at 10:16:08 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/01/2026 10:01, Dhruva Gole wrote:
>>> Add AM62L3 SoC to the dt-platdev blocklist to ensure proper handling
>>> of CPUFreq functionality. The AM62L3 will use its native TI CPUFreq
>>> driver implementation instead of the generic dt-platdev driver.
>>>
>>> This follows the same pattern as other TI SoCs like AM62A7, AM62D2,
>>> and AM62P5 which have been previously added to this blocklist.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>>> index 1708179b2610bca6035d10f0f4766eee6f73912e..29122bac2e22f6e7a8e8294cc01923c8a13d53c1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>>> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id blocklist[] __initconst = {
>>>  	{ .compatible = "ti,am62a7", },
>>>  	{ .compatible = "ti,am62d2", },
>>>  	{ .compatible = "ti,am62p5", },
>>> +	{ .compatible = "ti,am62l3", },
>>
>> p > l
> 
> Fair point, I thought more from a "latest SOC" point of view but the
> standard here is alphabetical, will re-spin.

This is not a TI-specific list, but all SoCs, so it is not sorted by
latest SoC. Neither sunxi nor Samsung are sorted that (I believe same
applies to others, but did not verify).

Best regards,
Krzysztof