From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69961C77B61 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236219AbjDYUDh (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:03:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33464 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235087AbjDYUDe (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:03:34 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B21A619A2 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:03:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1682453013; x=1713989013; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=reHRQOre2NO1+iT/Sg5jDcvNmur/+KiCLnVwPnJYHxI=; b=DraTa1bSjYxfH1NEfFfhpnx762mNwWNhucPX5vmJp4u4fgaLfpNUuEz4 f4c7A6JBNsVWYFDR/8s6dz5Qb9I+X35o/b6EpVpk9P0eyvXfVPvJC7QrT LbYxPjnm8zRQNeE3Qfjl1GbjgDPQAQj14m0lgd39PSF5gpSAQs3crYXVI e40ZSx4ma/n6JaXFDTV/LNfC1d+t194NaR2rUZYiabDJxzdmt8HriNZWQ 2wepXrm2RAw6vx/XyJwWbckMLls5bQUiSHykJzt8BwQ7Zhr7RyB/CXsTL WvQdaBZcTxs0/FXY7dMVgYgCyvTH1G8WYt6uQtX/SEsOdLngxpTAqrl8W A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10691"; a="374837854" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,226,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="374837854" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Apr 2023 13:03:33 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10691"; a="687604650" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,226,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="687604650" Received: from gchacko-mobl1.gar.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.215.145.52]) ([10.215.145.52]) by orsmga007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Apr 2023 13:03:27 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:03:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/cpu: fix intermittent lockup on poweroff Content-Language: en-US To: Tony Battersby , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Mario Limonciello , Tom Lendacky , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <3817d810-e0f1-8ef8-0bbd-663b919ca49b@cybernetics.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <3817d810-e0f1-8ef8-0bbd-663b919ca49b@cybernetics.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/25/23 12:26, Tony Battersby wrote: > - if (cpuid_eax(0x8000001f) & BIT(0)) > + if (c->extended_cpuid_level >= 0x8000001f && > + (cpuid_eax(0x8000001f) & BIT(0))) > native_wbinvd(); Oh, so the existing code is running into the > If a value entered for CPUID.EAX is higher than the maximum input > value for basic or extended function for that processor then the data > for the highest basic information leaf is returned behavior. It's basically looking at BIT(0) of some random extended leaf. Probably 0x80000008 based on your 'cpuid -r' output.