From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com (madrid.collaboradmins.com [46.235.227.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3CE4130E52 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706218924; cv=none; b=jVYsbiwFccwavjKLeor0yE7quxNfjQv4mydN6xS2YVxxTFZZDt2UEzEFL926Q0WcmJHKG0dN4kn3E3ef6H5YUEqEqWi9I/EvWqUynt/fDpruaWxImKFadVEjLePjS0tv+R9nfETfnuHg9yWJNABkwCbeqhoMvThns2P/xQpOfYE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706218924; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6qkcZYWngfmRTvoOwp5UnpiufJBrssnD1F59vptg1wY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=a80AobHJ9xohWHWLb+Yjg54KxsGpctBceMYKOfgr/Ambjax9nZtAfYnnwJ6k1hrC6j0JSqGnooLv7po/FiPy9lu/Rtv1uVZm7vW0lGsERPiIprrtV1dSVmktbHTgyhMxZEpGAUiKbf8MA68vFpgHZqTYUv2UqSDIGqPR6UXWGiE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=I5KffNlJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="I5KffNlJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1706218920; bh=6qkcZYWngfmRTvoOwp5UnpiufJBrssnD1F59vptg1wY=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=I5KffNlJy4qUnAehVXlDMpPEWTV7OGsIeSJlAox5l7zB9E2csGaYrZXUiTt9xEjRu 1wSHngLecv9nUrZZn4lK8E3BaQyzHkupXZ+00Y9dp2nxCDeYOlM2bxcNKNl1v50hKl vbw2F9hUDKfA51s87p4ygh9gU02b6CINPP2ILYS9lAYc+gG8dCnqpEFQqSKq9FGiT7 hH4JAu0etmynZD1NexRS/bBPKzSMpU+qNoYBO5CjfYxTK/XtVlTCwvqwMpd1nCNvFu mmmESnUNfoNGGwGFyIrYq2t3Ko4TX+LE7pYVe8mcLAEoMGpy7Lm5aZKCYu5VFr2M4J evd9vc0KwWfRA== Received: from [100.109.49.129] (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dmitry.osipenko) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C1A037813DA; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 00:41:56 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 17/30] drm/panfrost: Fix the error path in panfrost_mmu_map_fault_addr() Content-Language: en-US From: Dmitry Osipenko To: Steven Price , Boris Brezillon Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, David Airlie , Gerd Hoffmann , Gurchetan Singh , Chia-I Wu , Daniel Vetter , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= , Qiang Yu , Emma Anholt , Melissa Wen References: <20240105184624.508603-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> <20240105184624.508603-18-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: <20240105184624.508603-18-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/5/24 21:46, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > for (i = page_offset; i < page_offset + NUM_FAULT_PAGES; i++) { > + /* Can happen if the last fault only partially filled this > + * section of the pages array before failing. In that case > + * we skip already filled pages. > + */ > + if (pages[i]) > + continue; > + > pages[i] = shmem_read_mapping_page(mapping, i); Although, the shmem_read_mapping_page() should return same page if it was already allocated, isn't it? I.e. there was no bug here and the fixes/stable tags not needed. -- Best regards, Dmitry