From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Zack Rusin <zack.rusin@broadcom.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Huang Rui" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/ttm: Make sure the mapped tt pages are decrypted when needed
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 14:38:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5fe17fc-2d5a-4f78-9315-9fd05f58142e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABQX2QMg4L3oQe4pU4saBgopXw7CKyGrQa_LKE0xtSwyEKacnw@mail.gmail.com>
Am 26.01.24 um 06:10 schrieb Zack Rusin:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:51 AM Zack Rusin <zack.rusin@broadcom.com> wrote:
>> Some drivers require the mapped tt pages to be decrypted. In an ideal
>> world this would have been handled by the dma layer, but the TTM page
>> fault handling would have to be rewritten to able to do that.
>>
>> A side-effect of the TTM page fault handling is using a dma allocation
>> per order (via ttm_pool_alloc_page) which makes it impossible to just
>> trivially use dma_mmap_attrs. As a result ttm has to be very careful
>> about trying to make its pgprot for the mapped tt pages match what
>> the dma layer thinks it is. At the ttm layer it's possible to
>> deduce the requirement to have tt pages decrypted by checking
>> whether coherent dma allocations have been requested and the system
>> is running with confidential computing technologies.
>>
>> This approach isn't ideal but keeping TTM matching DMAs expectations
>> for the page properties is in general fragile, unfortunately proper
>> fix would require a rewrite of TTM's page fault handling.
>>
>> Fixes vmwgfx with SEV enabled.
>>
>> v2: Explicitly include cc_platform.h
>> v3: Use CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT instead of CC_ATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT to
>> limit the scope to guests and log when memory decryption is enabled.
> Hi, Christian.
>
> Gentle ping on that one. This is probably the cleanest we can get this
> code. Can we land this or is there anything else you'd like to see?
Sorry for the delay.
I'm not too familiar with the technical background, so I can't 100%
judge if this is correct or not.
But if it works for you I think we should give it a try, feel free to
add my Acked-by and push upstream through whatever branch you like.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> z
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-26 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-26 4:03 [PATCH] " Zack Rusin
2023-09-26 12:02 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-26 17:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Zack Rusin
2023-10-02 8:16 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-10-02 14:27 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-10-03 4:13 ` Zack Rusin
2023-10-03 8:39 ` Thomas Hellström
2024-01-05 13:51 ` [PATCH v3] " Zack Rusin
2024-01-05 13:53 ` Zack Rusin
2024-01-26 5:10 ` Zack Rusin
2024-01-26 13:38 ` Christian König [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f5fe17fc-2d5a-4f78-9315-9fd05f58142e@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zack.rusin@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®