From: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix rq lock state in hotplug ops
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:00:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f613ec9f-d793-46af-9218-70671960b309@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250428214320.137576-1-arighi@nvidia.com>
Hi Andrea,
Thanks for the fix. Now it cleanly passes the hotplug selftest.
Tested-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
On 4/29/25 06:43, Andrea Righi wrote:
> The ops.cpu_online() and ops.cpu_offline() callbacks incorrectly assume
> that the rq involved in the operation is locked, which is not the case
> during hotplug, triggering the following warning:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 20 at kernel/sched/sched.h:1504 handle_hotplug+0x280/0x340
>
> Fix by not tracking the target rq as locked in the context of
> ops.cpu_online() and ops.cpu_offline().
>
> Fixes: 18853ba782bef ("sched_ext: Track currently locked rq")
> Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index ac79067dc87e6..d0f40fd258752 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -3477,9 +3477,9 @@ static void handle_hotplug(struct rq *rq, bool online)
> scx_idle_update_selcpu_topology(&scx_ops);
>
> if (online && SCX_HAS_OP(cpu_online))
> - SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_online, rq, cpu);
> + SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_online, NULL, cpu);
> else if (!online && SCX_HAS_OP(cpu_offline))
> - SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_offline, rq, cpu);
> + SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_UNLOCKED, cpu_offline, NULL, cpu);
> else
> scx_ops_exit(SCX_ECODE_ACT_RESTART | SCX_ECODE_RSN_HOTPLUG,
> "cpu %d going %s, exiting scheduler", cpu,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-28 21:43 Andrea Righi
2025-04-29 0:00 ` Changwoo Min [this message]
2025-04-29 18:02 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f613ec9f-d793-46af-9218-70671960b309@igalia.com \
--to=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®