From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8BF520E032; Tue, 13 May 2025 18:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747162034; cv=none; b=h0aYiQ7mRdeJRCqM8JmpIDWZg+KXco/lr5YGw5pj+nOyhmoRg3a3A6scC475YJQlq4HcNGKyttJYQsg1+f28SSpYvm47hfWtehQCSsPgOPvaOarZIia1cBYtmVf41M4BUFoPUIGm77oNiz8WfAAWJFUquA9/gEHe+6z1KgDds9M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747162034; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RogUgGwR0FOP6KYfV+t2DS4AvPTOIL+mE8+yVO+7w0k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dLndxyVn/WLkKKlu8ryvCYSHPPmJ+HxZrN1G8KxK5q95EW7+d4OX+VslicM4mBNHDepKHgrF0p60/QwGf2Z250lfOaiw2JnCgdCNsYFZXqfiJPiYG9PvvI/4xwQBW0btyexUh5glVxIzjs+JSTdwZqv/4w1gzMBtvWFfoMp3IY8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=nFjfmaiB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="nFjfmaiB" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From: Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To:References; bh=L61EUFuE+Uq6nCLl8f3dUo/UmLoSS1/cO7xG1BCxA+c=; b=nF jfmaiBN+QXzHcGAxI2akzGtdEYv8hNnwN5bDkrKU2qOZkD3thr9CvnhfbCh9Sws/nn88v0oDli/Yw LghD3qJnTInrgopOeQRV3Dp1XSP7Inlufs+3/c3btAMq4FEM+LMov4OghGMahsKm5qU/X3M3paV7F iOCO059MV0q/rTU=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uEueZ-00CULZ-Gk; Tue, 13 May 2025 20:46:59 +0200 Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 20:46:59 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Gabor Juhos Cc: Linus Walleij , Gregory Clement , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Imre Kaloz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] pinctrl: armada-37xx: a couple of small fixes Message-ID: References: <20250512-pinctrl-a37xx-fixes-v1-0-d470fb1116a5@gmail.com> <60ef3803-4f8b-4d9b-bef8-6cf3708af057@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 06:51:35PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote: > 2025. 05. 13. 15:36 keltezéssel, Linus Walleij írta: > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 11:33 PM Andrew Lunn wrote: > >> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 04:22:36PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote: > >>> The series contains several small patches to fix various > >>> issues in the pinctrl driver for Armada 3700. > >> > >> I'm not sure all these should be for stable. Some are clear bugs, but > >> not propagating the errors has not bothered anybody so far, a > >> requirement for stable. > > > > So we are at -rc6 so I'm not sending these as fixes to Torvalds > > right now unless they are super-critical. > > > > I will merge this for v6.16 (-rc1) and then the stable maintainers > > will have to decide from the point it enters mainline. > > > > Gabor: can you look over the tags? Once you have decided > > on stable/non-stable tags I will merge the series. > > Sure, I will send a v2. Just a question, shall I also remove the 'Fixes' tags > along with the 'stable' ones? If I keep those, they might land up in stable > trees anyway. For the return values patches, i would drop the Fixes. It is just really continuing development work for the driver. Andrew