mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Weitao Wang <WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mathias.nyman@intel.com,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tonywwang@zhaoxin.com, weitaowang@zhaoxin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] xhci: Show zhaoxin xHCI root hub speed correctly
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 13:52:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6689241-9749-28a2-6da4-842f3253c678@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230421203853.387210-4-WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com>

On 21.4.2023 23.38, Weitao Wang wrote:
> Some zhaoxin xHCI controllers follow usb3.1 spec,
> but only support gen1 speed 5G. While in Linux kernel,
> if xHCI suspport usb3.1,root hub speed will show on 10G.
> To fix this issue of zhaoxin xHCI platforms, read usb speed ID
> supported by xHCI to determine root hub speed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Weitao Wang <WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com>
> ---
>   drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> index 6307bae9cddf..31d6ace9cace 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> @@ -5294,6 +5294,7 @@ static void xhci_hcd_init_usb2_data(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct usb_hcd *hcd)
>   static void xhci_hcd_init_usb3_data(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct usb_hcd *hcd)
>   {
>   	unsigned int minor_rev;
> +	unsigned int i, j;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Early xHCI 1.1 spec did not mention USB 3.1 capable hosts
> @@ -5323,6 +5324,27 @@ static void xhci_hcd_init_usb3_data(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct usb_hcd *hcd)
>   		hcd->self.root_hub->ssp_rate = USB_SSP_GEN_2x1;
>   		break;
>   	}
> +
> +	/* Usb3.1 has gen1 and gen2, Some zhaoxin's xHCI controller
> +	 * that follow usb3.1 spec but only support gen1.
> +	 */
> +	if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST) {
> +		minor_rev = 0;
> +		for (j = 0; j < xhci->num_port_caps; j++) {
> +			for (i = 0; i < xhci->port_caps[j].psi_count; i++) {
> +				if (XHCI_EXT_PORT_PSIV(xhci->port_caps[j].psi[i]) >= 5) {
> +					minor_rev = 1;
> +					break;
> +				}
> +			}
> +			if (minor_rev)
> +				break;
> +		}
> +		if (minor_rev != 1) {
> +			hcd->speed = HCD_USB3;
> +			hcd->self.root_hub->speed = USB_SPEED_SUPER;
> +		}
> +	}
>   	xhci_info(xhci, "Host supports USB 3.%x %sSuperSpeed\n",
>   		  minor_rev, minor_rev ? "Enhanced " : "");
>   

How about checking if port support over 5Gbps (psiv >= 5) when we parse the protocol speed ID
entries the first time? This way we could avoid looping through all the port_cap psiv values.

Something like:

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
index c4170421bc9c..2e4c80eb4972 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
@@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static void xhci_add_in_port(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, unsigned int num_ports,
  {
         u32 temp, port_offset, port_count;
         int i;
-       u8 major_revision, minor_revision;
+       u8 major_revision, minor_revision, tmp_minor_revision;
         struct xhci_hub *rhub;
         struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev;
         struct xhci_port_cap *port_cap;
@@ -1981,6 +1981,11 @@ static void xhci_add_in_port(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, unsigned int num_ports,
                  */
                 if (minor_revision > 0x00 && minor_revision < 0x10)
                         minor_revision <<= 4;
+               if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST) {
+                       tmp_minor_revision = minor_revision;
+                       minor_revision = 0;
+               }
+
         } else if (major_revision <= 0x02) {
                 rhub = &xhci->usb2_rhub;
         } else {
@@ -1989,10 +1994,6 @@ static void xhci_add_in_port(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, unsigned int num_ports,
                 /* Ignoring port protocol we can't understand. FIXME */
                 return;
         }
-       rhub->maj_rev = XHCI_EXT_PORT_MAJOR(temp);
-
-       if (rhub->min_rev < minor_revision)
-               rhub->min_rev = minor_revision;
  
         /* Port offset and count in the third dword, see section 7.2 */
         temp = readl(addr + 2);
@@ -2010,8 +2011,6 @@ static void xhci_add_in_port(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, unsigned int num_ports,
         if (xhci->num_port_caps > max_caps)
                 return;
  
-       port_cap->maj_rev = major_revision;
-       port_cap->min_rev = minor_revision;
         port_cap->psi_count = XHCI_EXT_PORT_PSIC(temp);
  
         if (port_cap->psi_count) {
@@ -2032,6 +2031,10 @@ static void xhci_add_in_port(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, unsigned int num_ports,
                                   XHCI_EXT_PORT_PSIV(port_cap->psi[i - 1])))
                                 port_cap->psi_uid_count++;
  
+                       if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST &&
+                           XHCI_EXT_PORT_PSIV(port_cap->psi[i]) >= 5)
+                               minor_revision = tmp_minor_revision;
+
                         xhci_dbg(xhci, "PSIV:%d PSIE:%d PLT:%d PFD:%d LP:%d PSIM:%d\n",
                                   XHCI_EXT_PORT_PSIV(port_cap->psi[i]),
                                   XHCI_EXT_PORT_PSIE(port_cap->psi[i]),
@@ -2041,6 +2044,15 @@ static void xhci_add_in_port(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, unsigned int num_ports,
                                   XHCI_EXT_PORT_PSIM(port_cap->psi[i]));
                 }
         }
+
+       rhub->maj_rev = major_revision;
+
+       if (rhub->min_rev < minor_revision)
+               rhub->min_rev = minor_revision;
+
+       port_cap->maj_rev = major_revision;
+       port_cap->min_rev = minor_revision;
+
         /* cache usb2 port capabilities */
         if (major_revision < 0x03 && xhci->num_ext_caps < max_caps)
                 xhci->ext_caps[xhci->num_ext_caps++] = temp;

Thanks
Mathias

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-05 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-21 20:38 [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix some issues of xHCI for zhaoxin Weitao Wang
2023-04-21 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] xhci: Add some quirks for zhaoxin xhci to fix issues Weitao Wang
2023-05-08  8:56   ` Mathias Nyman
2023-04-21 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] xhci: fix issue of cross page boundary in TRB prefetch Weitao Wang
2023-04-21 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] xhci: Show zhaoxin xHCI root hub speed correctly Weitao Wang
2023-05-05 10:52   ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2023-05-06 11:38     ` WeitaoWang-oc
2023-04-21 20:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] xhci: Add zhaoxin xHCI U1/U2 feature support Weitao Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f6689241-9749-28a2-6da4-842f3253c678@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=tonywwang@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=weitaowang@zhaoxin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®