Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-j722s-common-main: Add HSM M4F node

["Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>]

On 1/15/2026 11:23 AM, Padhi, Beleswar wrote:
>
> On 1/15/2026 11:16 AM, Kumar, Udit wrote:
>>
>> On 1/15/2026 11:11 AM, Padhi, Beleswar wrote:
>>> Hi Udit,
>>>
>>> On 1/15/2026 10:06 AM, Kumar, Udit wrote:
>>>> Hi Beleswar,
>>>>
>>>> On 1/14/2026 11:05 PM, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
>>>>> The TI K3 AM62P and J722S SoCs have a HSM (High Security Module) M4F
>>>>> core in the MAIN Voltage Domain which could be used to run secure
>>>>> services like Authentication. Add Device Tree Node definitions for 
>>>>> the
>>>>> HSM core in the respective SoC common main dtsi file.
>>>>>
>>>>> The HSM node is reserved to be loaded and booted by the early-stage
>>>>> bootloader. The firmware-name property is defined at the SoC level
>>>>> since the HSM is not a general-purpose remote core and boards are
>>>>> unlikely to use separate firmware. If needed in exceptional cases,
>>>>> board-specific device trees can override this property.
>>>>>
>>>>> The corresponding reg ranges of HSM node has also been added to its
>>>>> parent node's (cbass_main bus) ranges property.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v3: Changelog:
>>>>> [Nishanth]:
>>>>>   1. Use generic node name 'remoteproc'
>>>>>   2. Use label 'hsm' instead of 'hsm_m4fss'
>>>>>   3. Add a comment for separate SRAMs
>>>>>   4. Update firmware-name property to match existing naming 
>>>>> conventions
>>>>>   5. Change status to 'reserved' and add a commment
>>>>>   6. Re-order bootph-pre-ram property before vendor properties
>>>>>   7. Update commit msg adding rationale for firmware-name in SoC.dtsi
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to v2:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260106104755.948086-4-b-padhi@ti.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> v2: Changelog:
>>>>> 1. None
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to v1:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251231165102.950644-4-b-padhi@ti.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>   .../boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-main.dtsi | 17 
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++
>>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p.dtsi            |  1 +
>>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j722s-main.dtsi       |  5 +++++
>>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j722s.dtsi            |  1 +
>>>>>   4 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git 
>>>>> a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-main.dtsi 
>>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-main.dtsi
>>>>> index 3cf7c2b3ce2dd..0e1af2a69ca2e 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-main.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-j722s-common-main.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -1117,4 +1117,21 @@ vpu: video-codec@30210000 {
>>>>>           clocks = <&k3_clks 204 2>;
>>>>>           power-domains = <&k3_pds 204 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
>>>>>       };
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    hsm: remoteproc@43c00000 {
>>>>> +        compatible = "ti,hsm-m4fss";
>>>>> +        /* contiguous regions but instantiated separately in HW */
>>>>> +        reg = <0x00 0x43c00000 0x00 0x20000>,
>>>>> +              <0x00 0x43c20000 0x00 0x10000>,
>>>>> +              <0x00 0x43c30000 0x00 0x10000>;
>>>>> +        reg-names = "sram0_0", "sram0_1", "sram1";
>>>>> +        resets = <&k3_reset 225 1>;
>>>>> +        firmware-name = "am62p-hsm-m4f-fw";
>>>>
>>>> you don't need clock and power-domain for this ?
>>>
>>>
>>> That info is abstracted out via ti-sci calls. ti_sci_cmd_get_device()
>>> takes care of setting clocks and power domains for us.
>>>
>>> Same for other rprocs:
>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-mcu.dtsi#L178 
>>>
>>
>>
>> Is this specific handling for m4 core ? 
>
>
> For all single cores like M4, DSP, R5F0_0/R5F0_1 etc.

Ok


>
>> , I see other rproc got power at cluster level
>
>
> We don't make any ti-sci calls for the cluster level, which is why we
> need that info here in DT. Otherwise, ti-sci calls take care of the
> individual cores for us. That's why R5F child cores don't have
> power domain info in the DT:
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi#L1521-L1535 
>

R5 cores are inside cluster , it is be better to handle core and cluster 
in same way.

But this patch is not related to R5.

So

Reviewed-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>


>
> Thanks,
> Beleswar
>
>>
>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi#L1518 
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Beleswar
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +        bootph-pre-ram;
>>>>> +        ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
>>>>> +        ti,sci-dev-id = <225>;
>>>>> +        ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x80 0xff>;
>>>>> +        /* reserved for early-stage bootloader */
>>>>> +        status = "reserved";
>>>>> +    };
>>>>>   };
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p.dtsi 
>>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p.dtsi
>>>>> index e2c01328eb298..9d6266d6ddb82 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ cbass_main: bus@f0000 {
>>>>>                <0x00 0x31100000 0x00 0x31100000 0x00 0x00050000>, 
>>>>> /* USB1 DWC3 Core window */
>>>>>                <0x00 0x40900000 0x00 0x40900000 0x00 0x00030000>, 
>>>>> /* SA3UL */
>>>>> [..]