mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Frederic Weisbecker' <frederic@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Denis Arefev <arefev@swemel.ru>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 09/18] srcu: Fix srcu_struct node grpmask overflow on 64-bit systems
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 12:54:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6cc79b13ccf471aa275bee88559b6bd@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231013115902.1059735-10-frederic@kernel.org>

From: Frederic Weisbecker
> Sent: 13 October 2023 12:59
> 
> The value of a bitwise expression 1 << (cpu - sdp->mynode->grplo)
> is subject to overflow due to a failure to cast operands to a larger
> data type before performing the bitwise operation.
> 
> The maximum result of this subtraction is defined by the RCU_FANOUT_LEAF
> Kconfig option, which on 64-bit systems defaults to 16 (resulting in a
> maximum shift of 15), but which can be set up as high as 64 (resulting
> in a maximum shift of 63).  A value of 31 can result in sign extension,
> resulting in 0xffffffff80000000 instead of the desired 0x80000000.
> A value of 32 or greater triggers undefined behavior per the C standard.
> 
> This bug has not been known to cause issues because almost all kernels
> take the default CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF=16.  Furthermore, as long as a
> given compiler gives a deterministic non-zero result for 1<<N for N>=32,
> the code correctly invokes all SRCU callbacks, albeit wasting CPU time
> along the way.
> 
> This commit therefore substitutes the correct 1UL for the buggy 1.
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denis Arefev <arefev@swemel.ru>
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> index 833a8f848a90..5602042856b1 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static bool init_srcu_struct_nodes(struct srcu_struct *ssp, gfp_t gfp_flags)
>  				snp->grplo = cpu;
>  			snp->grphi = cpu;
>  		}
> -		sdp->grpmask = 1 << (cpu - sdp->mynode->grplo);
> +		sdp->grpmask = 1UL << (cpu - sdp->mynode->grplo);
>  	}
>  	smp_store_release(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_size_state, SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_BARRIER);
>  	return true;
> @@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ static void srcu_schedule_cbs_snp(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct srcu_node *snp
>  	int cpu;
> 
>  	for (cpu = snp->grplo; cpu <= snp->grphi; cpu++) {
> -		if (!(mask & (1 << (cpu - snp->grplo))))
> +		if (!(mask & (1UL << (cpu - snp->grplo))))
>  			continue;
>  		srcu_schedule_cbs_sdp(per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu), delay);
>  	}

That loop is entirely horrid.
The compiler almost certainly has to reload snp->grphi every iteration.
Also it looks as though the bottom bit of mask is checked first.
So how about:
	grphi = snp->grphi;
	for (cpu = snp->grplo; cpu <= grphi; cpu++, mask >>= 1) {
		if (!(mask & 1))
			continue;
		srcu_schedule_cbs_sdp(per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu), delay);
	}

	David		

> --
> 2.34.1

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-13 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-13 11:58 [PATCH 00/18] RCU fixes for v6.7 Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 01/18] Revert "checkpatch: Error out if deprecated RCU API used" Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 02/18] srcu: Fix error handling in init_srcu_struct_fields() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 03/18] rcu/tree: Remove superfluous return from void call_rcu* functions Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 04/18] rcu: Add sysfs to provide throttled access to rcu_barrier() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 05/18] rcu: Remove unused function declaration rcu_eqs_special_set() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 06/18] mm: Remove kmem_valid_obj() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 07/18] rcu: Dump memory object info if callback function is invalid Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 08/18] rcu: Eliminate rcu_gp_slow_unregister() false positive Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 09/18] srcu: Fix srcu_struct node grpmask overflow on 64-bit systems Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 12:54   ` David Laight [this message]
2023-10-13 14:11     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 10/18] rcu: kmemleak: Ignore kmemleak false positives when RCU-freeing objects Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 11/18] rcu: Use rcu_segcblist_segempty() instead of open coding it Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 12/18] rcu: Assume IRQS disabled from rcu_report_dead() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 13/18] rcu: Assume rcu_report_dead() is always called locally Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 14/18] rcu: Conditionally build CPU-hotplug teardown callbacks Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 15/18] rcu: Standardize explicit CPU-hotplug calls Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:59 ` [PATCH 16/18] rcu: Comment why callbacks migration can't wait for CPUHP_RCUTREE_PREP Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:59 ` [PATCH 17/18] srcu: Fix callbacks acceleration mishandling Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:59 ` [PATCH 18/18] srcu: Only accelerate on enqueue time Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f6cc79b13ccf471aa275bee88559b6bd@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=arefev@swemel.ru \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®