From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48A2C3F2C6 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC252166E for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=shipmail.org header.i=@shipmail.org header.b="h3NN+FFK" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728711AbgCCKX4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 05:23:56 -0500 Received: from pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se ([79.136.2.42]:37410 "EHLO pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726661AbgCCKX4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2020 05:23:56 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F203F80D; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 11:23:54 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=shipmail.org header.i=@shipmail.org header.b=h3NN+FFK; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bahnhof.se Received: from pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sPW0qWza6X9Z; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 11:23:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail1.shipmail.org (h-205-35.A357.priv.bahnhof.se [155.4.205.35]) (Authenticated sender: mb878879) by pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 16E073F524; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 11:23:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (h-205-35.A357.priv.bahnhof.se [155.4.205.35]) by mail1.shipmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0D41360106; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 11:23:53 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=shipmail.org; s=mail; t=1583231033; bh=RVfyASf7XP1Z1TIdelkLDDDCUoluWWyyQf/Mz9CblFU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=h3NN+FFKgh26TwA0W2Nj/kfUBdOlOyuAjB6PzNdD12sCjH0ZvmvrGjbVqy3cDjF0D C169qGfKK3a/jIs8N5QghDRkGfgk0T33yUbv4UShzFYYpafZJXTW8Y47BKkMeekbxD W9LELOU4YwHeFBlR8mXQRvfvfJe8xVcliTRk9nhg= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Huge page-table entries for TTM To: Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralph Campbell , pv-drivers@vmware.com, Dan Williams , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= , "Kirill A. Shutemov" References: <20200220122719.4302-1-thomas_os@shipmail.org> <20200229200432.55b5b64f46dc2f2f80fa7461@linux-foundation.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Hellstr=c3=b6m_=28VMware=29?= Organization: VMware Inc. Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 11:23:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200229200432.55b5b64f46dc2f2f80fa7461@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/1/20 5:04 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:08:04 +0100 Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote: > >> I'm wondering what's the best way here to get the patches touching mm >> reviewed and accepted? >> While drm people and VMware internal people have looked at them, I think >> the huge_fault() fallback splitting and the introduction of >> vma_is_special_huge() needs looking at more thoroughly. >> >> Apart from that, if possible, I think the best way to merge this series >> is also through a DRM tree. > Patches 1-3 look OK to me. I just had a few commenting/changelogging > niggles. Thanks for reviewing, Andrew. I just updated the series following your comments. Thanks, Thomas