From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1163848AbdDXAr1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Apr 2017 20:47:27 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:59847 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1163764AbdDXArT (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Apr 2017 20:47:19 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,242,1488873600"; d="scan'208";a="1139248881" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] perf/x86/intel: Record branch type To: Jiri Olsa Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org References: <1492690075-17243-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <1492690075-17243-3-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <20170423135559.GA23073@krava> From: "Jin, Yao" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:47:14 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170423135559.GA23073@krava> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/23/2017 9:55 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 08:07:50PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote: > > SNIP > >> >> +#define X86_BR_TYPE_MAP_MAX 16 >> + >> +static int >> +common_branch_type(int type) >> +{ >> + int i, mask; >> + const int branch_map[X86_BR_TYPE_MAP_MAX] = { >> + PERF_BR_CALL, /* X86_BR_CALL */ >> + PERF_BR_RET, /* X86_BR_RET */ >> + PERF_BR_SYSCALL, /* X86_BR_SYSCALL */ >> + PERF_BR_SYSRET, /* X86_BR_SYSRET */ >> + PERF_BR_INT, /* X86_BR_INT */ >> + PERF_BR_IRET, /* X86_BR_IRET */ >> + PERF_BR_JCC, /* X86_BR_JCC */ >> + PERF_BR_JMP, /* X86_BR_JMP */ >> + PERF_BR_IRQ, /* X86_BR_IRQ */ >> + PERF_BR_IND_CALL, /* X86_BR_IND_CALL */ >> + PERF_BR_NONE, /* X86_BR_ABORT */ >> + PERF_BR_NONE, /* X86_BR_IN_TX */ >> + PERF_BR_NONE, /* X86_BR_NO_TX */ >> + PERF_BR_CALL, /* X86_BR_ZERO_CALL */ >> + PERF_BR_NONE, /* X86_BR_CALL_STACK */ >> + PERF_BR_IND_JMP, /* X86_BR_IND_JMP */ >> + }; >> + >> + type >>= 2; /* skip X86_BR_USER and X86_BR_KERNEL */ >> + mask = ~(~0 << 1); > is that a fancy way to get 1 into the mask? what do I miss? > >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < X86_BR_TYPE_MAP_MAX; i++) { >> + if (type & mask) >> + return branch_map[i]; > I wonder some bit search would be faster in here, but maybe not big deal > > jirka I just think the branch_map[] doesn't contain many entries (16 entries here), so maybe checking 1 bit one time should be acceptable. I just want to keep the code simple. But if the number of entries is more (e.g. 64), maybe it'd better check 2 or 4 bits one time. Thanks Jin Yao > >> + >> + type >>= 1; >> + } >> + >> + return PERF_BR_NONE; >> +} >> + >> /*