From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/4] PCI: Don't ignore valid response before CRS timeout
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:02:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7127748-24cd-37bd-544a-8cba6bf5906d@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170818213203.15145.36487.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
On 8/18/2017 5:32 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> While waiting for a device to become ready (i.e., to return a non-CRS
> completion to a read of its Vendor ID), if we got a valid response to the
> very last read before timing out, we printed a warning and gave up on the
> device even though it was actually ready.
>
> For a typical 60s timeout, we wait about 65s (it's not exact because of the
> exponential backoff), but we treated devices that became ready between 33s
> and 65s as though they failed.
>
> Move the Device ID read later so we check whether the device is ready
> immediately, before checking for a timeout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index c31310db0404..08ea844ac4ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1849,15 +1849,16 @@ bool pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn, u32 *l,
>
> msleep(delay);
> delay *= 2;
> - if (pci_bus_read_config_dword(bus, devfn, PCI_VENDOR_ID, l))
> - return false;
> - /* Card hasn't responded in 60 seconds? Must be stuck. */
> +
There is still a problem here. We'll wait some time above and return without checking if
we actually found the card or not.
> if (delay > crs_timeout) {
> printk(KERN_WARNING "pci %04x:%02x:%02x.%d: not responding\n",
> pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
> PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> return false;
> }
> +
> + if (pci_bus_read_config_dword(bus, devfn, PCI_VENDOR_ID, l))
> + return false;
> }
>
> return true;
>
>
Here is another shot at it. Sorry, I don't have a diff syntax. I made up the function
by copy paste.
while ((*l & 0xffff) == 0x0001) {
if (!crs_timeout)
return false;
/* Card hasn't responded in 60 seconds? Must be stuck. */
if (delay > crs_timeout) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "pci %04x:%02x:%02x.%d: not responding\n",
pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
PCI_FUNC(devfn));
return false;
}
msleep(delay);
delay *= 2;
if (pci_bus_read_config_dword(bus, devfn, PCI_VENDOR_ID, l))
return false;
}
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-21 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-18 21:31 [PATCH v11 0/4] PCI: Use CRS Software Visibility to wait for device to become ready Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-18 21:32 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] PCI: Don't ignore valid response before CRS timeout Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-21 14:02 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2017-08-21 17:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-18 21:32 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] PCI: Factor out pci_bus_wait_crs() Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-21 13:53 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-08-21 19:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-21 19:37 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-08-21 20:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-21 20:32 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-08-21 21:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-23 4:40 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-08-18 21:32 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] PCI: Handle CRS ("device not ready") returned by device after FLR Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-18 21:32 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] PCI: Warn periodically while waiting for device to become ready Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7127748-24cd-37bd-544a-8cba6bf5906d@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome