Re: [PATCH 6.14 000/197] 6.14.7-rc1 review

[Christian Heusel <christian@heusel.eu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2786 bytes --]

On 25/05/15 02:34PM, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Same problem in rc2 just tested

Yes the fix is still on the way to mainline (see the mail from Mario
pointing to the patches posted to amd-gfx), but given that it's just
some log entries that stop again and nothing serious it should not be of
much issue.

Cheers,
Chris

> Den tis 13 maj 2025 kl 07:26 skrev Christian Heusel <christian@heusel.eu>:
> >
> > On 25/05/12 07:37PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.14.7 release.
> > > There are 197 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 May 2025 17:19:58 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I have noticed that the following commit produces a whole bunch of lines
> > in my journal, which looks like an error for me:
> >
> > > Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
> > >     drm/amd/display: Fix wrong handling for AUX_DEFER case
> >
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> >
> > this does not seem to be serious, i.e. the system otherwise works as
> > intended but it's still noteworthy. Is there a dependency commit missing
> > maybe? From the code it looks like it was meant to be this way 🤔
> >
> > You can find a full journal here, with the logspammed parts in
> > highlight:
> > https://gist.github.com/christian-heusel/e8418bbdca097871489a31d79ed166d6#file-dmesg-log-L854-L981
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]