From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com (mail-lj1-f182.google.com [209.85.208.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7151F2E175F for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 13:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.182 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752584905; cv=none; b=HqWaV/7eWSBTtE50o4GpJ03MaOLye8PpxKOlQyEeXyq+i2r9tBIPqwZ8z1p6VDBC1u8tCFiYeqG9maeIrBlkXfinSYwfRzC3yDlAPS5/RxNs6s4cTGo0mKaNvkWk77vVTpGUUJ5OXuwjcCJ94f0GY6xYO0meacnjdwnb8v3LRmg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752584905; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WnK15eyFGnOOiCqP/4GEMlvDMj+juzHnpjX7yiY+mlw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=cfpXegGD9NoFdYRkoPNP2ZBDDZhe7ESKHjltgfjT8WIiHG1/Wrko2wfbEnZE1PUe1V1Kh9a5weYN20cHchdmINUrPiM52eH3sjZiua7rUof/cchAtx5wocso4PJ9JIjmVmDfhmEAV1UWst6w6bsptxMSYRg5avS9x/9pHj+395g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=yB0QQ4uf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="yB0QQ4uf" Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-32c9ebe7190so7541141fa.1 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 06:08:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1752584901; x=1753189701; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gq36CP0MCDZZzeTcntw2nMahOQrUrL9LQjFqfs8ZNN8=; b=yB0QQ4ufMICg9Tf92uXHeDJK04V4HnNAd700fo/W6dWenTiVqN8T5/1qy84FP3obzV 20W1i3Wmxl37UmJX2z8+j6Ogk7NOIPFlzAYHPrACh0fbXga+B3GkdP3KG7L8ECoqQajs KJpc8TQtkD7wEdcRFpaxi5pxjFVzn8f0r3CwG3LL/C9lzR7mvzBJjsVeNl5xx0dosUKD nSRv1RRxFYSBAGFXfNKBNU0CskHhxyC3PHQpPVv0R4Xcf7nFJPqyLyCDmEz37ATAaApP Bgg2kx/Zp9Titou62DEjEN1SyJOK1Kmi6TZuQ1M+Xo0YLTOvSfgWXGP4RTDzgm6ILhuY ETUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1752584901; x=1753189701; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gq36CP0MCDZZzeTcntw2nMahOQrUrL9LQjFqfs8ZNN8=; b=JEyFWEoQr4xkx8OQTkY5miB0pvFhZNG/EQ9Uy8wJcoACgcmDWz34/Z6j2Lu8hN0dXB 64CvnJu7NRkzk/tHN9XW1aCKMkvRzMCBjebHvRVL9iIQs6vI9I13sIBCd4qTBecR6NHS XfTqMJS++Nkj34YVe0Y2i3w21/Juk5qMM2KDsVEjRIihbRxliteBPR1Gvld1185D1pxf cTb1YXRslAE9E5uZEGMZha3FeVNKdorofIwePdBJPSqPFFtq96HmG1cZzvbauOf4BXGs LQ6+mm4tnkM3N8V2+foOmDmjQeIGQef50Gi0GonFRazGmdo8nynDrWC9yJG5Vi4GCBr5 91gw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWG8iLKLJJvihLixQEuECxP37WStwg7wLspeuNeJ/m7i+mLVxEwPP7G4sUkMYL8lNmOm8IKhTkebvOwnt4=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyfvllw+JukSabJOJBfIHHz2fd6GtzrhjqKDM8azp084TI5k7tH 1nz/aq2ET+0+dG3t3RVozVQk3Kr1Vgeix1debifTkyGYOw7On/cMW2dLwGzvxmudZQ8= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv+ft7X+vwsP/VFNzeT7GCuRxjWsV9NyJbdqh/nc1KQX8RaLi/16sfgKeFbKtm GzP426vdH3SZ/fHN9AxL8430rqnduWx432UBe/obkKklJKDFPb8UUvZ8TzGc+U9PgHVuIadVKVV mbWfjZq1iHWhJik2k0KCoRKdMQ9fN/7SApnAV80Gdw1hr7tI1sOLwi2xFmnZ6mBfFYeXuOlAl2L 0dpPQW0SjlVod4LWe12eT4aF5Kgc/JGdY/MhpmYOwOiQACvyBzPVCJT4g0QNIvy3xP4oJQ5pfT1 iH4OMuSaIWC4QjzyH9778Kml8G5bZQUd5FxgrYIyuQfTthPinGUit8feFvB0iAgcjDh5SeGCY0l TMA8E1ljXc8/ZHnm8d0UBZO5w2PoqOf9p5hTGwXjFfelS5W6fvKA+w1kBwNaM3KIn/AJOuxePJ6 Ug X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHMVeoHz8y2i5KJdatSFzaiHdlhoX4K7Fmxq+ulokvZuQc+6Z5CQPHMAkcSdnhIcDc9V2Ge5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3a8e:b0:556:2e02:6957 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-55a1fdd8762mr204686e87.9.1752584899957; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 06:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (88-112-128-43.elisa-laajakaista.fi. [88.112.128.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2adb3069b0e04-55943b5fa81sm2301334e87.142.2025.07.15.06.08.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jul 2025 06:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 16:08:18 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/15] Add dt-bindings and dtsi changes for CAMSS on x1e80100 silicon Content-Language: ru-RU To: Bryan O'Donoghue , Vladimir Zapolskiy , Bryan O'Donoghue , Bjorn Andersson , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Robert Foss , Todor Tomov , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Konrad Dybcio Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio References: <20250711-b4-linux-next-25-03-13-dtsi-x1e80100-camss-v7-0-0bc5da82f526@linaro.org> <9361e954-e2c9-41c6-be4c-12b0e4f367f5@linaro.org> <4281887a-e7c0-43bc-9e72-96f0e432c58f@nxsw.ie> From: Vladimir Zapolskiy In-Reply-To: <4281887a-e7c0-43bc-9e72-96f0e432c58f@nxsw.ie> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/15/25 14:16, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 15/07/2025 11:27, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >>>> 1. This is an incorrect assumption, unfortunately it was not discussed >>>> previously for whatever reason, good news now it gets a discussion under >>>> drivers/phy changeset. >>> Perhaps you can explain why ? >> It's quite easy, sensors are not connected to CSIDs. Moreover data flows >> from any sensor can be processed on any CSID, there is no static hardware >> links, which are attempted to be introduced. > > This statement is not correct. Please elaborate, what statement above is not correct? > The port@ in CAMSS pertains to the camss-csiphy device not to the > camss-csid device, so there is no hard link to any specific CSID in the > dts scheme here. And here it's just a confirmation that my statement above is correct, so please be consistent, and especially in any kind of accusations like you've just given above. Any of ports in CAMSS device tree are properties of CSIPHY IPs, and ports are not the properties of CSID or whatever is left in CAMSS after the extraction. If CSIPHYs are extracted from CAMSS into its own device tree node, so all CSIPHY only properties shall be removed from CAMSS, like CSIPHY reg, interrupts, clocks and ports as well. -- Best wishes, Vladimir