From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Restrict mapping level based on guest MTRR iff they're used
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:08:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f76cbfeca245fcd5e5d69cb91af9a0a1d6aaf1d0.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715230016.3762909-5-seanjc@google.com>
On Fri, 2022-07-15 at 23:00 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Restrict the mapping level for SPTEs based on the guest MTRRs if and only
> if KVM may actually use the guest MTRRs to compute the "real" memtype.
> For all forms of paging, guest MTRRs are purely virtual in the sense that
> they are completely ignored by hardware, i.e. they affect the memtype
> only if software manually consumes them. The only scenario where KVM
> consumes the guest MTRRs is when shadow_memtype_mask is non-zero and the
> guest has non-coherent DMA, in all other cases KVM simply leaves the PAT
> field in SPTEs as '0' to encode WB memtype.
>
> Note, KVM may still ultimately ignore guest MTRRs, e.g. if the backing
> pfn is host MMIO, but false positives are ok as they only cause a slight
> performance blip (unless the guest is doing weird things with its MTRRs,
> which is extremely unlikely).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 52664c3caaab..82f38af06f5c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -4295,14 +4295,26 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_handle_page_fault);
>
> int kvm_tdp_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> {
> - while (fault->max_level > PG_LEVEL_4K) {
> - int page_num = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(fault->max_level);
> - gfn_t base = (fault->addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) & ~(page_num - 1);
> + /*
> + * If the guest's MTRRs may be used to compute the "real" memtype,
> + * restrict the mapping level to ensure KVM uses a consistent memtype
> + * across the entire mapping. If the host MTRRs are ignored by TDP
> + * (shadow_memtype_mask is non-zero), and the VM has non-coherent DMA
> + * (DMA doesn't snoop CPU caches), KVM's ABI is to honor the memtype
> + * from the guest's MTRRs so that guest accesses to memory that is
> + * DMA'd aren't cached against the guest's wishes.
> + *
> + * Note, KVM may still ultimately ignore guest MTRRs for certain PFNs,
> + * e.g. KVM will force UC memtype for host MMIO.
> + */
> + if (shadow_memtype_mask && kvm_arch_has_noncoherent_dma(vcpu->kvm)) {
> + for ( ; fault->max_level > PG_LEVEL_4K; --fault->max_level) {
> + int page_num = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(fault->max_level);
> + gfn_t base = (fault->addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) & ~(page_num - 1);
>
> - if (kvm_mtrr_check_gfn_range_consistency(vcpu, base, page_num))
> - break;
> -
> - --fault->max_level;
> + if (kvm_mtrr_check_gfn_range_consistency(vcpu, base, page_num))
> + break;
> + }
> }
>
> return direct_page_fault(vcpu, fault);
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-18 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-15 23:00 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Memtype related cleanups Sean Christopherson
2022-07-15 23:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Reject loading KVM if host.PAT[0] != WB Sean Christopherson
2022-07-15 23:06 ` Jim Mattson
2022-07-15 23:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-18 9:42 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-15 23:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: Drop unnecessary goto+label in kvm_arch_init() Sean Christopherson
2022-07-18 10:03 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-18 15:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-15 23:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Add shadow mask for effective host MTRR memtype Sean Christopherson
2022-07-18 12:08 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-18 16:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-15 23:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Restrict mapping level based on guest MTRR iff they're used Sean Christopherson
2022-07-18 12:08 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2022-07-19 17:59 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Memtype related cleanups Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f76cbfeca245fcd5e5d69cb91af9a0a1d6aaf1d0.camel@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®