Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ufs: core: Add a quirk for handling broken LSDBS field in controller capabilities register

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>]

On 8/14/24 10:16 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 0b1787074215..8c9ff8696bcd 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -2426,7 +2426,11 @@ static inline int ufshcd_hba_capabilities(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   	 * 0h: legacy single doorbell support is available
>   	 * 1h: indicate that legacy single doorbell support has been removed
>   	 */
> -	hba->lsdbs_sup = !FIELD_GET(MASK_LSDBS_SUPPORT, hba->capabilities);
> +	if (!(hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_LSDBS_CAP))
> +		hba->lsdbs_sup = !FIELD_GET(MASK_LSDBS_SUPPORT, hba->capabilities);
> +	else
> +		hba->lsdbs_sup = true;
> +
>   	if (!hba->mcq_sup)
>   		return 0;

An additional question: since the next patch only sets
UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_LSDBS_CAP for a board with a UFSHCI 3.0 controller,
do we really need the new quirk or can we replace the "!(hba->quirks &
UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_LSDBS_CAP)" test with a test that verifies that the
UFSHCI controller implements version 4.0 or later of the specification?

Thanks,

Bart.