From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC127C43331 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 12:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0B2206CD for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 12:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2392348AbfIFMWr (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:22:47 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0064.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.64]:54045 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728509AbfIFMWq (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:22:46 -0400 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CFD182CED5B; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 12:22:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: blow41_51b7c3cbb5603 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2838 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.152.152]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 12:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Address issues with SPDX requirements and PEP-263 From: Joe Perches To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Linux Media Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Sven Eckelmann , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Doug Smythies , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien?= Cedeyn , Vincenzo Frascino , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , Thierry Reding , Armijn Hemel , Jiri Olsa , Uwe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Federico Vaga , Allison Randal , Alexander Shishkin Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 05:22:40 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20190906090228.1971ede9@coco.lan> References: <20daa66d58e01f33a248b8703aa8e37933ef4154.camel@perches.com> <20190906090228.1971ede9@coco.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.1-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 09:02 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Thu, 05 Sep 2019 13:05:08 -0700 > Joe Perches escreveu: > > > On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 16:57 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > The description at Documentation/process/license-rules.rst is very strict > > > with regards to the position where the SPDX tags should be. > > [] > > > PS.: I sent already a RFC version for those patches along with this > > > thread: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b32c2e46b91e7bcda2a9bd140673f06d71b2487a.camel@perches.com/ > > > > Nice, thanks. > > > > Now I guess I have to update checkpatch too. > > (unless you want to... ;) > > Yeah, it makes sense to update checkpatch too. Perhaps it could be > changed to use the "-s" flag on the check, instead of implementing > its own logic to handle the position. I think checkpatch needs its own logic as its source input is a patch file.