From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0FEC433FE for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D92B611C4 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230355AbhIOSFK (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:05:10 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([96.44.175.130]:46050 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229479AbhIOSFI (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:05:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1631729029; bh=4c/OxzXQiVl5H5d8rn9uBBYGEsojFyrpOehYLnAZ7uw=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iBoR4GfS4vN1now4PsbnN0S2EqeVQCYWLbmBxQvySteCxB1AkH6NVX+DIjGNCXLv0 YIdhDhAm12Y0GM9dO/xBm8XDumnhya6m99PxOeG98fXtX4+NXyH+pT5/HI+2wkIfFA c36guGH7g70bN/IFADMtKCq79xhpyTnckvbRZ8Gs= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4ED128090B; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:03:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zp5bTEmntpo9; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:03:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1631729029; bh=4c/OxzXQiVl5H5d8rn9uBBYGEsojFyrpOehYLnAZ7uw=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iBoR4GfS4vN1now4PsbnN0S2EqeVQCYWLbmBxQvySteCxB1AkH6NVX+DIjGNCXLv0 YIdhDhAm12Y0GM9dO/xBm8XDumnhya6m99PxOeG98fXtX4+NXyH+pT5/HI+2wkIfFA c36guGH7g70bN/IFADMtKCq79xhpyTnckvbRZ8Gs= Received: from jarvis.lan (c-67-166-170-96.hsd1.va.comcast.net [67.166.170.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A41412808F7; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] Folios as a potential Kernel/Maintainers Summit topic? From: James Bottomley To: Theodore Ts'o , Johannes Weiner Cc: Kent Overstreet , Matthew Wilcox , Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , "Darrick J. Wong" , Christoph Hellwig , David Howells , ksummit@lists.linux.dev Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:03:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2021-09-15 at 13:42 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: [...] > Would this be helpful? (Or Linus could pull either the folio or > pageset branch, and make this proposal obsolete, which would be > great. :-) This is a technical rather than process issue isn't it? You don't have enough technical people at the Maintainer summit to help meaningfully. The ideal location, of course, was LSF/MM which is now not happening. However, we did offer the Plumbers BBB infrastructure to willy for a MM gathering which could be expanded to include this. James