From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
To: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>,
<dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>, <robdclark@gmail.com>,
<quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>, <sean@poorly.run>,
<airlied@gmail.com>, <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
<marijn.suijten@somainline.org>, <vkoul@kernel.org>,
<dianders@chromium.org>, <marex@denx.de>,
<vladimir.lypak@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dsi: Add missing check for alloc_ordered_workqueue
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 13:50:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7bf366a-dc32-47a2-79fc-c6f7f1f93ab7@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230109025044.27766-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
On 09/01/23 08:20, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> Add check for the return value of alloc_ordered_workqueue as it may return
> NULL pointer and cause NULL pointer dereference.
> Moreover, change the "goto fail" into "return ret" and drop the "fail"
> label since they are the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
> Changelog:
>
> v1 -> v2:
>
> 1. Change the "goto fail" into "return ret" and drop the "fail" label.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> index 89aadd3b3202..819f5be5fd77 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> @@ -1884,7 +1884,7 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
> msm_host = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*msm_host), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!msm_host) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> msm_host->pdev = pdev;
> @@ -1893,14 +1893,14 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
> ret = dsi_host_parse_dt(msm_host);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: failed to parse dt\n", __func__);
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> msm_host->ctrl_base = msm_ioremap_size(pdev, "dsi_ctrl", &msm_host->ctrl_size);
> if (IS_ERR(msm_host->ctrl_base)) {
> pr_err("%s: unable to map Dsi ctrl base\n", __func__);
> ret = PTR_ERR(msm_host->ctrl_base);
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -1909,7 +1909,7 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
> if (!msm_host->cfg_hnd) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> pr_err("%s: get config failed\n", __func__);
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
> cfg = msm_host->cfg_hnd->cfg;
>
> @@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
> if (msm_host->id < 0) {
> ret = msm_host->id;
> pr_err("%s: unable to identify DSI host index\n", __func__);
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /* fixup base address by io offset */
> @@ -1927,19 +1927,19 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
> cfg->regulator_data,
> &msm_host->supplies);
> if (ret)
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
>
> ret = dsi_clk_init(msm_host);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: unable to initialize dsi clks\n", __func__);
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> msm_host->rx_buf = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, SZ_4K, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!msm_host->rx_buf) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> pr_err("%s: alloc rx temp buf failed\n", __func__);
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> ret = devm_pm_opp_set_clkname(&pdev->dev, "byte");
> @@ -1977,15 +1977,17 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
>
> /* setup workqueue */
> msm_host->workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("dsi_drm_work", 0);
> + if (!msm_host->workqueue) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + return ret;
Why not simply return -ENOMEM;
instead?
> + }
> +
> INIT_WORK(&msm_host->err_work, dsi_err_worker);
>
> msm_dsi->id = msm_host->id;
>
> DBG("Dsi Host %d initialized", msm_host->id);
> return 0;
> -
> -fail:
> - return ret;
> }
>
> void msm_dsi_host_destroy(struct mipi_dsi_host *host)
--
Thanks and Regards,
Dhruva Gole
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-09 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-09 2:50 Jiasheng Jiang
2023-01-09 8:20 ` Dhruva Gole [this message]
2023-01-09 9:09 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7bf366a-dc32-47a2-79fc-c6f7f1f93ab7@ti.com \
--to=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.lypak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®