From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PULL_REQUEST,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E96EC433E1 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 19:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9042072D for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 19:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="nnz1DA/c" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727824AbgHUT66 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:58:58 -0400 Received: from hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:8979 "EHLO hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726884AbgHUT64 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:58:56 -0400 Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:58:41 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:58:55 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:58:55 -0700 Received: from [10.2.94.162] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 19:58:55 +0000 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tee subsystem pin_user_pages for v5.8 To: Olof Johansson , Jens Wiklander List-Id: CC: , , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ARM , References: <20200526131259.GA97001@jade> <20200821184910.GB3407@lx2k> From: John Hubbard Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:58:54 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200821184910.GB3407@lx2k> X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL101.nvidia.com (172.20.187.10) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1598039921; bh=931QlgWgkSLnaXy3M6zhhPT2hTM3lsmrxSz7sNfiqzM=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP: X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=nnz1DA/cKW4KvK7uDJzLxRuIqIXK+DuN9tuKtlC5zqI3Y03Xe4x0V7/obhtO9LINQ bPzqUheBtXuKWJL4qJNiCC56pkkMFxkQ5055n1AvEYyrDCGeDs1IeOzCFnLmwtYMN1 vkRAme4qWDo9m3P6sYPYlAy48DmSMjA8V4yhSfkqJm5EENV9HSZ/razc0w8lVxqU30 PPZqQhh0tXpe5McsFrTs2uReW5ouYPhW1YXZMP0kEzcZZRws8X7ar1YS76zNH9yDXt JP7HNZk2aWlBGMybHSAo4WuO3vUcf2H9IBZci8IYgRNO4irVpziG49BUtHJPY6JqRe 679ahwfMrEgkQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/21/20 11:49 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 03:12:59PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote: >> Hello arm-soc maintainers, >> >> Please pull this small patch converting the tee subsystem to use >> pin_user_pages() instead of get_user_pages(). >> >> Thanks, >> Jens >> >> The following changes since commit ae83d0b416db002fe95601e7f97f64b59514d936: >> >> Linux 5.7-rc2 (2020-04-19 14:35:30 -0700) >> >> are available in the Git repository at: >> >> git://git.linaro.org:/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git tags/tee-pin-user-pages-for-5.8 >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 37f6b4d5f47b600ec4ab6682c005a44a1bfca530: >> >> tee: convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages() (2020-05-26 10:42:41 +0200) > > Hi, I noticed this never got merged, but I don't see any follow-up here that > retracts it. Is it still pending merge such that I should queue it for v5.10? > I think so. I had marked it in my notes as "accepted, and the maintainer will eventually merge it", and I left it at that. It's still desirable. thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA