Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: ti: pruss: Update bindings for K3 AM62x SoCs

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 02/06/2022 12:03, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 16/05/22 20:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/05/2022 14:33, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> On 28/04/22 11:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 27/04/2022 09:27, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>> Update the PRUSS bindings for the PRUSSM instance present in
>>>>> AM625 SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml | 1 +
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
>>>>> index 64461d432004..cf13e5179657 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
>>>>> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ properties:
>>>>>        - ti,am654-icssg   # for K3 AM65x SoC family
>>>>>        - ti,j721e-icssg   # for K3 J721E SoC family
>>>>>        - ti,am642-icssg   # for K3 AM64x SoC family
>>>>> +      - ti,am625-pruss   # for K3 AM62x SoC family
>>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Looks like out of order (although for some reason before it was also
>>>> misordered...).
>>>
>>> These are really in the chronological order of the introduction of SoCs.
>>> Isn't that okay to have?
>>
>> You mean order of release on the market of order of adding files here?
>> The first is ok, the latter would mean there is no order at all.
> 
> I meant order of release to market. Anyways, I'll send a patch to change
> the order to alphabetic order.

It's okay to keep it then in such release-market order. Up to you:


Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>


Best regards,
Krzysztof