From: Ding Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: dinghui@sangfor.com.cn,
Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pengdonglin@sangfor.com.cn,
huangcun@sangfor.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethtool: Fix out-of-bounds copy to user
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 23:01:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7e23fe6-4d30-ef1b-a431-3ef6ec6f77ba@sangfor.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6110cf9f-c10e-4b9b-934d-8d202b7f5794@lunn.ch>
On 2023/6/2 8:26 下午, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Changing the copy size would not fix this. The problem is the driver
>>> will be overwriting with the size that it thinks it should be using.
>>> Reducing the value that is provided for the memory allocations will
>>> cause the driver to corrupt memory.
>>>
>>
>> I noticed that, in fact I did use the returned length to allocate
>> kernel memory, and only use adjusted length to copy to user.
>
> This is also something i checked when quickly looking at the patch. It
> does look correct.
>
Thanks.
> Also, RTNL should be held during the time both calls are made into the
> driver. So nothing from userspace should be able to get in the middle
> of these calls to change the number of queues.
>
The RTNL lock is already be held during every each ioctl in dev_ethtool().
rtnl_lock();
rc = __dev_ethtool(net, ifr, useraddr, ethcmd, state);
rtnl_unlock();
--
Thanks,
-dinghui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-02 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-01 11:28 Ding Hui
2023-06-01 15:04 ` Alexander H Duyck
2023-06-02 1:46 ` Ding Hui
2023-06-02 12:26 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-02 15:01 ` Ding Hui [this message]
2023-06-02 15:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-02 16:01 ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-02 16:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-02 18:02 ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-03 1:51 ` Ding Hui
2023-06-03 5:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-03 7:11 ` Ding Hui
2023-06-04 17:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-05 3:39 ` Ding Hui
2023-06-05 18:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-08 9:06 ` Ding Hui
2023-06-08 14:17 ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-09 15:25 ` Ding Hui
2023-06-09 17:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-09 17:59 ` Alexander Duyck
2023-06-10 3:47 ` Ding Hui
2023-06-10 4:01 ` Ding Hui
2023-06-02 15:30 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7e23fe6-4d30-ef1b-a431-3ef6ec6f77ba@sangfor.com.cn \
--to=dinghui@sangfor.com.cn \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=huangcun@sangfor.com.cn \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pengdonglin@sangfor.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®