From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3062ACDB482 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:48:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343936AbjJQNsV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:48:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36304 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234143AbjJQNsU (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:48:20 -0400 Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6DA8EA for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 06:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imladris.home.surriel.com ([10.0.13.28] helo=imladris.surriel.com) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.1) (envelope-from ) id 1qskPy-0000VA-2n; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:47:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] hugetlbfs: replace hugetlb_vma_lock with invalidate_lock From: Rik van Riel To: Mike Kravetz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, leit@meta.com, willy@infradead.org, Ray Fucillo , Jacklin Kotikian Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:47:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20231017005236.GA236970@monkey> References: <20231006040020.3677377-1-riel@surriel.com> <20231006040020.3677377-5-riel@surriel.com> <20231017005236.GA236970@monkey> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: riel@surriel.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2023-10-16 at 17:52 -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: > > The Combined faults number drops by over 50%.  This is not nearly as > dramatic > as the changes originally seen.  However, I do expect that there will > be > a noticeable performance regression.  Ray may be able to help running > real > workloads on real applications and database. > > I suggest we hold off on adding this change until further, more real > world > analysis can be performed.  The simplification of the code is nice, > but I > would hate to regress any workloads. Agreed. Thank you for running those tests. Andrew, would it be possible to drop patch 4/4 from -mm? -- All Rights Reversed.