From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Chen Ridong" <chenridong@huawei.com>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Call rebuild_sched_domains() directly in hotplug
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:45:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7fe97bb-05ca-4187-99a3-537ddad718ee@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260304184100.71015-1-longman@redhat.com>
On 2026/3/5 2:41, Waiman Long wrote:
> Besides deferring the call to housekeeping_update(), commit 6df415aa46ec
> ("cgroup/cpuset: Defer housekeeping_update() calls from CPU hotplug
> to workqueue") also defers the rebuild_sched_domains() call to
> the workqueue. So a new offline CPU may still be in a sched domain
> or new online CPU not showing up in the sched domains for a short
> transition period. That could be a problem in some corner cases and
> can be the cause of a reported test failure[1]. Fix it by calling
Miss Link [1]?
> rebuild_sched_domains_cpuslocked() directly in hotplug as before. If
> isolated partition invalidation or recreation is being done, the
> housekeeping_update() call to update the housekeeping cpumasks will
> still be deferred to a workqueue.
>
> In commit 3bfe47967191 ("cgroup/cpuset: Move
> housekeeping_update()/rebuild_sched_domains() together"),
> housekeeping_update() is called before rebuild_sched_domains() because
> it needs to access the HK_TYPE_DOMAIN housekeeping cpumask. That is now
> changed to use the static HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT cpumask as HK_TYPE_DOMAIN
> cpumask is now changeable at run time. As a result, we can move the
> rebuild_sched_domains() call before housekeeping_update() with
> the slight advantage that it will be done in the same cpus_read_lock
> critical section without the possibility of interference by a concurrent
> cpu hot add/remove operation.
>
Nice.
> As it doesn't make sense to acquire cpuset_mutex/cpuset_top_mutex after
> calling housekeeping_update() and immediately release them again, move
> the cpuset_full_unlock() operation inside update_hk_sched_domains()
> and rename it to cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock() to signify that it will
> release the full set of locks.
>
> Fixes: 6df415aa46ec ("cgroup/cpuset: Defer housekeeping_update() calls from CPU hotplug to workqueue")
> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 271bb99b1b9d..f7657b325490 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static int generate_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t **domains,
> /*
> * Cgroup v2 doesn't support domain attributes, just set all of them
> * to SD_ATTR_INIT. Also non-isolating partition root CPUs are a
> - * subset of HK_TYPE_DOMAIN housekeeping CPUs.
> + * subset of HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT housekeeping CPUs.
> */
> for (i = 0; i < ndoms; i++) {
> /*
> @@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ static int generate_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t **domains,
> */
> if (!csa || csa[i] == &top_cpuset)
> cpumask_and(doms[i], top_cpuset.effective_cpus,
> - housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN));
> + housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT));
> else
> cpumask_copy(doms[i], csa[i]->effective_cpus);
> if (dattr)
> @@ -1331,17 +1331,22 @@ static bool prstate_housekeeping_conflict(int prstate, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
> }
>
> /*
> - * update_hk_sched_domains - Update HK cpumasks & rebuild sched domains
> + * cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock - Rebuild sched domains, update HK & unlock
> *
> - * Update housekeeping cpumasks and rebuild sched domains if necessary.
> - * This should be called at the end of cpuset or hotplug actions.
> + * Update housekeeping cpumasks and rebuild sched domains if necessary and
> + * then do a cpuset_full_unlock().
> + * This should be called at the end of cpuset operation.
> */
> -static void update_hk_sched_domains(void)
> +static void cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock(void)
> + __releases(&cpuset_mutex)
> + __releases(&cpuset_top_mutex)
> {
> + /* force_sd_rebuild will be cleared in rebuild_sched_domains_locked() */
> + if (force_sd_rebuild)
> + rebuild_sched_domains_locked();
> +
> if (update_housekeeping) {
> - /* Updating HK cpumasks implies rebuild sched domains */
> update_housekeeping = false;
> - force_sd_rebuild = true;
> cpumask_copy(isolated_hk_cpus, isolated_cpus);
>
> /*
> @@ -1352,22 +1357,19 @@ static void update_hk_sched_domains(void)
> mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
> cpus_read_unlock();
> WARN_ON_ONCE(housekeeping_update(isolated_hk_cpus));
> - cpus_read_lock();
> - mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
> + mutex_unlock(&cpuset_top_mutex);
> + } else {
> + cpuset_full_unlock();
> }
> - /* force_sd_rebuild will be cleared in rebuild_sched_domains_locked() */
> - if (force_sd_rebuild)
> - rebuild_sched_domains_locked();
> }
>
> /*
> - * Work function to invoke update_hk_sched_domains()
> + * Work function to invoke cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock()
> */
> static void hk_sd_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> cpuset_full_lock();
> - update_hk_sched_domains();
> - cpuset_full_unlock();
> + cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock();
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -3232,8 +3234,7 @@ ssize_t cpuset_write_resmask(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>
> free_cpuset(trialcs);
> out_unlock:
> - update_hk_sched_domains();
> - cpuset_full_unlock();
> + cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock();
> if (of_cft(of)->private == FILE_MEMLIST)
> schedule_flush_migrate_mm();
> return retval ?: nbytes;
> @@ -3340,8 +3341,7 @@ static ssize_t cpuset_partition_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
> cpuset_full_lock();
> if (is_cpuset_online(cs))
> retval = update_prstate(cs, val);
> - update_hk_sched_domains();
> - cpuset_full_unlock();
> + cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock();
> return retval ?: nbytes;
> }
>
> @@ -3515,8 +3515,7 @@ static void cpuset_css_killed(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> /* Reset valid partition back to member */
> if (is_partition_valid(cs))
> update_prstate(cs, PRS_MEMBER);
> - update_hk_sched_domains();
> - cpuset_full_unlock();
> + cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock();
> }
>
> static void cpuset_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> @@ -3925,11 +3924,13 @@ static void cpuset_handle_hotplug(void)
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> -
> /*
> - * Queue a work to call housekeeping_update() & rebuild_sched_domains()
> - * There will be a slight delay before the HK_TYPE_DOMAIN housekeeping
> - * cpumask can correctly reflect what is in isolated_cpus.
> + * rebuild_sched_domains() will always be called directly if needed
> + * to make sure that newly added or removed CPU will be reflected in
> + * the sched domains. However, if isolated partition invalidation
> + * or recreation is being done (update_housekeeping set), a work item
> + * will be queued to call housekeeping_update() to update the
> + * corresponding housekeeping cpumasks after some slight delay.
> *
> * We rely on WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT to not requeue a work item that
> * is still pending. Before the pending bit is cleared, the work data
> @@ -3938,8 +3939,10 @@ static void cpuset_handle_hotplug(void)
> * previously queued work. Since hk_sd_workfn() doesn't use the work
> * item at all, this is not a problem.
> */
> - if (update_housekeeping || force_sd_rebuild)
> - queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &hk_sd_work);
> + if (force_sd_rebuild)
> + rebuild_sched_domains_cpuslocked();
> + if (update_housekeeping)
> + queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &hk_sd_work);
>
> free_tmpmasks(ptmp);
> }
This means that rebuild schedule domains are decoupled from HK updates, right?
I'm wondering again whether we can do the same for changes to
cpus/partition/cpus.exclusive. If we can defer the HK update, then the
cpuset_top_mutex might no longer be necessary.
This patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
--
Best regards,
Ridong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-04 18:41 Waiman Long
2026-03-05 6:45 ` Chen Ridong [this message]
2026-03-05 19:16 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-05 13:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-05 19:27 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7fe97bb-05ca-4187-99a3-537ddad718ee@huaweicloud.com \
--to=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®