From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] perf: Generic hotplug support for a PMU with a scope
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:09:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f856d105-5463-4b8b-8715-0e6871165616@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240802151643.1691631-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Hi Kan Liang,
(+ cc Perf ML)
On 02/08/2024 17:16, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>
> The perf subsystem assumes that the counters of a PMU are per-CPU. So
> the user space tool reads a counter from each CPU in the system wide
> mode. However, many PMUs don't have a per-CPU counter. The counter is
> effective for a scope, e.g., a die or a socket. To address this, a
> cpumask is exposed by the kernel driver to restrict to one CPU to stand
> for a specific scope. In case the given CPU is removed,
> the hotplug support has to be implemented for each such driver.
>
> The codes to support the cpumask and hotplug are very similar.
> - Expose a cpumask into sysfs
> - Pickup another CPU in the same scope if the given CPU is removed.
> - Invoke the perf_pmu_migrate_context() to migrate to a new CPU.
> - In event init, always set the CPU in the cpumask to event->cpu
>
> Similar duplicated codes are implemented for each such PMU driver. It
> would be good to introduce a generic infrastructure to avoid such
> duplication.
>
> 5 popular scopes are implemented here, core, die, cluster, pkg, and
> the system-wide. The scope can be set when a PMU is registered. If so, a
> "cpumask" is automatically exposed for the PMU.
>
> The "cpumask" is from the perf_online_<scope>_mask, which is to track
> the active CPU for each scope. They are set when the first CPU of the
> scope is online via the generic perf hotplug support. When a
> corresponding CPU is removed, the perf_online_<scope>_mask is updated
> accordingly and the PMU will be moved to a new CPU from the same scope
> if possible.
Thank you for the patch.
It looks like this modification causes the following warning on my side
when shutting down a VM running a kernel built with a debug config
including CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y (and CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y):
> # /usr/lib/klibc/bin/poweroff
>
> =============================
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> 6.12.0-rc3+ #3 Not tainted
> -----------------------------
> kernel/events/core.c:13962 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> 3 locks held by poweroff/11748:
> #0: ffffffff9b441e28 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_reboot (kernel/reboot.c:770)
> #1: ffffffff9b43eab0 ((reboot_notifier_list).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain (kernel/notifier.c:388)
> #2: ffffffff9b6d06c8 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: perf_event_exit_cpu_context (kernel/events/core.c:13983)
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 11748 Comm: poweroff Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3+ #3
> Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)
> lockdep_rcu_suspicious (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6822)
> perf_event_clear_cpumask (kernel/events/core.c:13962 (discriminator 9))
> ? __pfx_perf_event_clear_cpumask (kernel/events/core.c:13939)
> ? acpi_execute_simple_method (drivers/acpi/utils.c:679)
> ? __pfx_acpi_execute_simple_method (drivers/acpi/utils.c:679)
> ? md_notify_reboot (drivers/md/md.c:9860)
> perf_event_exit_cpu_context (kernel/events/core.c:13984 (discriminator 1))
> perf_reboot (kernel/events/core.c:14066 (discriminator 3))
> ? trace_notifier_run (include/trace/events/notifier.h:59 (discriminator 2))
> notifier_call_chain (kernel/notifier.c:93)
> blocking_notifier_call_chain (kernel/notifier.c:389)
> kernel_power_off (kernel/reboot.c:294)
> __do_sys_reboot (kernel/reboot.c:771)
> ? __pfx___do_sys_reboot (kernel/reboot.c:717)
> ? __pfx_ksys_sync (fs/sync.c:98)
> do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1))
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
It is very easy for me to reproduce it: simply by stopping the VM. Just
in case, here are the steps I used to have the same VM:
$ cd [kernel source code]
$ echo true > .virtme-exec-run
$ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
--pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
auto-debug -e RCU_EXPERT -e PROVE_RCU_LIST
I have one question below about the modification you did here.
(...)
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index aa3450bdc227..5e1877c4cb4c 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
(...)
> @@ -13730,6 +13816,40 @@ static void __perf_event_exit_context(void *__info)
> raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> }
>
> +static void perf_event_clear_cpumask(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + int target[PERF_PMU_MAX_SCOPE];
> + unsigned int scope;
> + struct pmu *pmu;
> +
> + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, perf_online_mask);
> +
> + for (scope = PERF_PMU_SCOPE_NONE + 1; scope < PERF_PMU_MAX_SCOPE; scope++) {
> + const struct cpumask *cpumask = perf_scope_cpu_topology_cpumask(scope, cpu);
> + struct cpumask *pmu_cpumask = perf_scope_cpumask(scope);
> +
> + target[scope] = -1;
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pmu_cpumask || !cpumask))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, pmu_cpumask))
> + continue;
> + target[scope] = cpumask_any_but(cpumask, cpu);
> + if (target[scope] < nr_cpu_ids)
> + cpumask_set_cpu(target[scope], pmu_cpumask);
> + }
> +
> + /* migrate */
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry, lockdep_is_held(&pmus_srcu)) {
Here is the line causing the warning, because rcu_read_lock() is not
used before.
I don't know this code, but I guess you are not only doing read
operations here if you are migrating something, right? This operation is
done under the "pmus_lock", maybe the "_rcu" variant is not needed here?
So just using this instead is maybe enough?
list_for_each_entry(pmu, &pmus, entry) {
> + if (pmu->scope == PERF_PMU_SCOPE_NONE ||
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(pmu->scope >= PERF_PMU_MAX_SCOPE))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (target[pmu->scope] >= 0 && target[pmu->scope] < nr_cpu_ids)
> + perf_pmu_migrate_context(pmu, cpu, target[pmu->scope]);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void perf_event_exit_cpu_context(int cpu)
> {
> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
> @@ -13737,6 +13857,11 @@ static void perf_event_exit_cpu_context(int cpu)
>
> // XXX simplify cpuctx->online
> mutex_lock(&pmus_lock);
> + /*
> + * Clear the cpumasks, and migrate to other CPUs if possible.
> + * Must be invoked before the __perf_event_exit_context.
> + */
> + perf_event_clear_cpumask(cpu);
> cpuctx = per_cpu_ptr(&perf_cpu_context, cpu);
> ctx = &cpuctx->ctx;
>
> @@ -13744,7 +13869,6 @@ static void perf_event_exit_cpu_context(int cpu)
> smp_call_function_single(cpu, __perf_event_exit_context, ctx, 1);
> cpuctx->online = 0;
> mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
> - cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, perf_online_mask);
> mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock);
> }
> #else
(...)
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-23 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-02 15:16 [PATCH 0/7] " kan.liang
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf: " kan.liang
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-09-12 10:12 ` Steven Price
2024-09-12 14:53 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-19 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] " Guenter Roeck
2024-09-19 16:28 ` Liang, Kan
2024-10-23 17:09 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2024-10-23 17:46 ` Liang, Kan
2024-10-23 18:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf: Add PERF_EV_CAP_READ_SCOPE kan.liang
2024-09-06 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-06 15:26 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf/x86/intel/cstate: Clean up cpumask and hotplug kan.liang
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Clean up cpumask and hotplug for perfmon kan.liang
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 5/7] dmaengine: idxd: " kan.liang
2024-08-05 15:40 ` Dave Jiang
2024-08-05 17:46 ` Fenghua Yu
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf/x86/rapl: Move the pmu allocation out of CPU hotplug kan.liang
2024-09-09 9:26 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-09-09 13:02 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-09 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-09 17:11 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-08-02 15:16 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf/x86/rapl: Clean up cpumask and hotplug kan.liang
2024-09-10 9:59 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2024-09-04 12:44 ` [PATCH 0/7] Generic hotplug support for a PMU with a scope Liang, Kan
2024-09-06 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-06 15:30 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-06 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-06 15:30 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f856d105-5463-4b8b-8715-0e6871165616@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®