Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: avoid using plain integer as NULL pointer

["Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>]

On 2025-11-09 20:57:54+0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2025 at 08:27:29PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > The integer zero should not be used as NULL pointer.
> > It is invalid and sparse will complain about it.
> > 
> > Use proper NULL pointers instead.
> 
> Huh ? I've been using that for decades and seeing it everywhere. That's
> quite bizarre, 0 is perfectly valid as a pointer. Ah, here it is, in
> C99:6.3.2.3:
> 
>   An integer constant expression with the value 0, or such an expression
>   cast to type void *, is called a null pointer constant.
> 
> The change is small, so if it hurts sparse, I'm fine with changing it,
> but at least the commit message should be adjusted to say that sparse
> doesn't like it and not that it's not valid.

Yeah, indeed '0' is special and valid, even in C23.
My recollection was wrong. Thanks for the hint!

> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202509261452.g5peaXCc-lkp@intel.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
> 
> For the patch: Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>

And thanks again.


Thomas