From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f170.google.com (mail-qk1-f170.google.com [209.85.222.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64AE31537C9 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731170173; cv=none; b=Tu1cuSTiX4FSg3BmhM5Mn4ym1tMTmKNpYR+rE9YEYIO54/UywtSOM4ccIktHFAqnRzjAe58mJSRDzWi8vXA0oOykV7eTXJ211cne6iz8sKUugv/3DXrBZewdQc8cnJyxONtS32oIUnYmDDcXv8BygYcaFo44z3K6C8bzlU6ezG0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731170173; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1zw4x5pQ+s0kBi09AAI4rx8p8hKJYjtPeE1I8rzMFvM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=JUFNX6cGo/I5UsIY8NEscRb18K/CljRlOTYEEipmYfPnO311aRkFEFT7avxhhM/4CCUt0habxDIpvmhTh/7g4O1O7P1pTcN0SHqEGmTfMxDLLQ49AqNrxLKw0OGqIzs2GeVcetBeBWITM71U7di7ZAEqS2Bu5b6exV6J2RzvSWs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=broadcom.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=broadcom.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com header.i=@broadcom.com header.b=QTBkzIuk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=broadcom.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=broadcom.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com header.i=@broadcom.com header.b="QTBkzIuk" Received: by mail-qk1-f170.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7b15eadee87so217372985a.2 for ; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 08:36:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; t=1731170170; x=1731774970; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LiyXTt78v6KIZQ1Ji+ZoKsI5Ur+Se/pukGeJe0h1QHs=; b=QTBkzIukXO/v+Oq7d1nDN7ZAVuCYSprCwhsPH2i5zCp1nfOCD2/eHG689p43iarI9j ZZt1vZoPyqeobWR9z9WELOFMpkYR7Pr2Af5eJvSHWJ0IjrJVaufnZvDA+Zurr7ZC2UFD y1DnArp+Jn10dEvA0YaFct3RvrPAXjM5UKlnA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731170170; x=1731774970; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LiyXTt78v6KIZQ1Ji+ZoKsI5Ur+Se/pukGeJe0h1QHs=; b=YBUrdHJwV+RBuJePijxsmcx/SMiHCKAh9E3ivoVvOiblVdpcYuVzfXmFMJMINVwFTN rd/13/QvovBPpJJySKzvWLXz93TG48knzvV5mOaUSNztodMlwetJ2mCPfKZ8R0UkG89m rf29Eb3cKtnqF6ObaomELRDBebsR8ACN0ciprw6WjzVLZSD6qZ1nQT3+2fq2wdXZjM8E y46/IYIIx3ezhsbyRM60lvfXWxKInjEPoeh3z2bJKvv9TlTA5/29J5cKyU5gIupZZPn1 n780clst/3/teaZZMrQRn8Va6zuPFjR5MmGx13lpbG5Hb3I9Y+OycCOKJuYUKGBBGJrT USzw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXlQ5dk5ubtIMjGfEoMLnSgC2N8dD+FGdwmUGEr0VE39T6NYGJ0ASPBtLap48rBbdpOJLsnUfmobQgifwU=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yydfit7REd8ES78LvxesJ65lEsYs1Kg/ZAmWiVuyIe6Y3zV+tUv Z2hlqKrNGNDWrdCg/28MiFGgM84xQc0yFdPztx/qRbSSJ8G4K5EDBwKFYi/1Cw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHR7LHF6bAJTfqfdMdT6vSoZ1qZIMt2KdNyCPNQiI/13HtKv9OHU9ir/QulbNCGPSOqD5aPSg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:24d3:b0:7b1:547d:9ba8 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7b331d8c12fmr867466785a.21.1731170170256; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 08:36:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (ip68-4-215-93.oc.oc.cox.net. [68.4.215.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-7b32ac63da6sm272249685a.58.2024.11.09.08.36.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Nov 2024 08:36:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 08:36:06 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mmc: pwrseq_simple: Handle !RESET_CONTROLLER properly To: Stefan Wahren , Philipp Zabel , Ulf Hansson , Marco Felsch , Catalin Popescu Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20241108130647.8281-1-wahrenst@gmx.net> Content-Language: en-US From: Florian Fainelli In-Reply-To: <20241108130647.8281-1-wahrenst@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/8/2024 5:06 AM, Stefan Wahren wrote: > The recent introduction of reset control in pwrseq_simple introduced > a regression for platforms without RESET_CONTROLLER support, because > devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared() would return NULL and make all > resets no-ops. Instead of enforcing this dependency, rely on this behavior > to determine reset support. As a benefit we can get the rid of the > use_reset flag. > > Fixes: 73bf4b7381f7 ("mmc: pwrseq_simple: add support for one reset control") > Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli -- Florian