From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Oleg Keri <okerixx@gmail.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
Prasanna Kumar T S M <ptsm@linux.microsoft.com>,
Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com, sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: update capacity_freq_ref when the boost state changes
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:57:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8b0745c-d265-4112-90fe-79a08ad01553@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910063440.4677-3-okerixx@gmail.com>
On 10.09.26 08:34, Oleg Keri wrote:
> capacity_freq_ref is latched from policy->cpuinfo.max_freq by
> init_cpu_capacity_callback() on CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, and never
> updated afterwards.
>
> cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() excludes CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ entries
> while boost is disabled, so on a system that boots with boost off the
> latched value is the non-boost maximum. Enabling boost later raises
> policy->cpuinfo.max_freq but leaves capacity_freq_ref behind.
>
> Two things then go wrong on arm64, where the AMU drives frequency
> invariance. amu_scale_freq_tick() caps the computed scale at
> SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE, so a CPU running above capacity_freq_ref
> saturates at 1024: the scheduler cannot tell a boosted CPU from one at
> the sustained maximum, and utilisation is underestimated. And
IMHO, this is where the concept of 'cpufreq pressure' on CPU capacity
comes in.
The cpu_capacity value is calculated based on highest_perf. (1)
In case you start with 'boost == 0' nominal_perf might might be lower
than highest_perf.
cpufreq_update_pressure() calculates this value:
cpufreq_pressure = Cmax * (1 - fcapped - fmax) (2)
[ fcapped = policy->max, fmax = capacity_freq_ref ]
Example on RADXA Orion 06 CPU10:
$ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/acpi_cppc/*
...
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/acpi_cppc/highest_perf:7876
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/acpi_cppc/lowest_freq:800
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/acpi_cppc/lowest_nonlinear_perf:2520
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/acpi_cppc/lowest_perf:2520
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/acpi_cppc/nominal_freq:2500
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/acpi_cppc/nominal_perf:6600 <-- hacked
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/acpi_cppc/reference_perf:1000
...
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/cpu_capacity <-- (1)
984
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/cpufreq/boost
0
dmesg (added log)
[ 8.065337] cpufreq_update_pressure(): policy->related_cpus=[10-11]
policy->max=2500000 pressure=173 <-- (2)
# echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/cpufreq/boost
1
dmesg (added log)
[38137.194134] cpufreq_update_pressure(): policy->related_cpus=[10-11]
policy->max=3031666 pressure=0 <-- (2)
The task scheduler gets informed via:
get_actual_cpu_capacity(int cpu)
capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
capacity -= max(hw_load_avg(cpu_rq(cpu)), cpufreq_get_pressure(cpu));
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
return capacity;
[...]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 6:34 [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64/cpufreq: report and track frequencies above 4.19 GHz Oleg Keri
2026-09-10 6:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: topology: fix arch_freq_get_on_cpu() overflow " Oleg Keri
2026-09-14 7:04 ` Beata Michalska
2026-09-16 10:52 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-16 11:23 ` Oleg Keri
2026-09-17 10:01 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-10 6:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: update capacity_freq_ref when the boost state changes Oleg Keri
2026-09-17 9:57 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8b0745c-d265-4112-90fe-79a08ad01553@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=okerixx@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=ptsm@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®