From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93ADFC433B4 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 07:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B09160E09 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 07:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229879AbhEDHFc (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2021 03:05:32 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:20460 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229721AbhEDHFc (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2021 03:05:32 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14474HG1148126; Tue, 4 May 2021 03:04:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=r2ME6H6lhBrw1IN5ZZtG9XfZxaqmoLe/vkQHSKs9uwU=; b=FjPK9GoXSqkPDufiM5JI5is+s0GSnuy/w8NuQBPjlMKhLL0IdwBHwh5j09SIVSZaAF2l g5qEciChc6L3Wdwcrycca41cc2YHXWVft+vhHkThXCLrdYaEFd0m+xyriIvMmeU0DHXL iLdC5u5pa+tjpn9MnuRwQ0hnM3CXB9wCb5m7RWBugKowMw1Ev+mH4xwzchkWzMJNrvE8 Izciuze7OpncgzF7oxGUHNbz+jKBPVoxWJFa0dDGtjhEzqSYyIreOxMqyL5wmI2FkC4A DBWWVpAt6pTIlQLp6TOS0TDtXxuxSgxSOTSBbvHGVbHCNQ4STPuz6P8wJ/kISb4GwPMI zA== Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38b1hj80r1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 04 May 2021 03:04:17 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 1446rRDm011658; Tue, 4 May 2021 07:04:05 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 388xm88jv8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 04 May 2021 07:04:05 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 14473akc29360402 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 4 May 2021 07:03:36 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1433911C04A; Tue, 4 May 2021 07:04:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC61C11C05C; Tue, 4 May 2021 07:04:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pomme.local (unknown [9.145.18.121]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 4 May 2021 07:04:01 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM To: Tyrel Datwyler , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org Cc: nathanl@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210428094758.28665-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> <87fsz95qso.fsf@linux.ibm.com> <9d29bf8c-9e97-c179-6897-8e25fa4eb516@linux.ibm.com> <271ef351-b89c-ba68-3b6d-baa24cc0021b@linux.ibm.com> <1eac9540-e8b4-53be-1f27-4c36f92c8a5e@linux.ibm.com> From: Laurent Dufour Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 09:03:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Vu9wfwbCv4MvyX7AzWmC0v68poH9B0D1 X-Proofpoint-GUID: Vu9wfwbCv4MvyX7AzWmC0v68poH9B0D1 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-04_02:2021-05-04,2021-05-04 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105040052 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 03/05/2021 à 22:44, Tyrel Datwyler a écrit : > On 5/3/21 10:28 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote: >> Le 01/05/2021 à 01:58, Tyrel Datwyler a écrit : >>> On 4/30/21 9:13 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote: >>>> Le 29/04/2021 à 21:12, Tyrel Datwyler a écrit : >>>>> On 4/29/21 3:27 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >>>>>> Laurent Dufour writes: >>>>>> > > Snip > >>> >>> As of today I don't have a problem with your patch. This was more of me pointing >>> out things that I think are currently wrong with our memory hotplug >>> implementation, and that we need to take a long hard look at it down the road. >> >> I do agree, there is a lot of odd things there to address in this area. >> If you're ok with that patch, do you mind to add a reviewed-by? >> > > Can you send a v4 with the fix for the duplicate update included? Of course ! I wrote it last week, but let in the to-be-sent list, my mistake.