From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89CEC433EF for ; Thu, 19 May 2022 03:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233068AbiESDI5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2022 23:08:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51530 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233028AbiESDIu (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2022 23:08:50 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B76AD9E86 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 20:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE9023A; Wed, 18 May 2022 20:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.162.42.8] (unknown [10.162.42.8]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 347F83F73D; Wed, 18 May 2022 20:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 08:38:43 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] amba: Drop builtin_amba_driver() Content-Language: en-US To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Linux ARM , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Russell King , Wang Kefeng , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20220517062929.3109873-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> From: Anshuman Khandual In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/18/22 17:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 7:29 AM Anshuman Khandual > wrote: >> >> Drop builtin_amba_driver() which is not used anymore. > > The patch looks correct, but I don't see the purpose. Are you trying > to discourage > having amba drivers as built-in? Otherwise the next time we get an amba > driver that cannot be a loadable module, someone might want to add back the > same macro. Right, then it should be added back. But for now this is just dead code and not being used, hence why keep it ?