From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: perf record doesn't work on rtd129x SoC
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:28:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f90748d0-8112-3aa8-0c88-e35a8d6e72d3@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191204045559.GA10458@udknight>
Hi YanQing,
+ LAKML + Mark + Will
Am 04.12.19 um 05:55 schrieb Wang YanQing:
> I use "perf record" to debug performance issue on RTD1296 SOC, it does't work, but
> the "perf stat" is ok!
Thanks for the report - which board, branch and (base) tag are you
testing against? And are you building perf yourself from kernel sources,
or are you using some distro package?
I only have Busybox in my initrd on DS418; I have not tested perf.
> After some dig in the kernel, I find the reason is no pmu overflow interrupt, I think
> below pmu configuration isn't right for RTD1296:
> "
> arm_pmu: arm-pmu {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a53-pmu";
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 48 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> };
> "
>
> We need 4 PMU SPI for RTD1296 (4 cores), and I guess the 48 isn't right too.
Note that above rtd129x.dtsi snippet is not complete. See rtd1296.dtsi:
&arm_pmu {
interrupt-affinity = <&cpu0>, <&cpu1>, <&cpu2>, <&cpu3>;
};
48 and high/4 match what I see in the latest BSP:
https://github.com/BPI-SINOVOIP/BPI-M4-bsp/blob/master/linux-rtk/arch/arm64/boot/dts/realtek/rtd129x/rtd-1296.dtsi#L116
> Any suggestion is welcome.
>
> Thanks!
The only difference I see is "arm,cortex-a53-pmu" vs. "arm,armv8-pmuv3".
By my reading of arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c the only difference
between the two should be the name and an extra cache_map. You could try
the other compatible string in your .dts, but I doubt it'll help.
Hopefully the Realtek or Arm guys can shed some light.
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-04 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-04 4:55 Wang YanQing
2019-12-04 7:28 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2019-12-04 11:20 ` Robin Murphy
2019-12-04 11:38 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-12-04 14:51 ` Robin Murphy
2019-12-09 9:18 ` Wang YanQing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f90748d0-8112-3aa8-0c88-e35a8d6e72d3@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=udknight@gmail.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®