Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: can: fixed-transceiver: Add new CAN fixed transceiver bindings

[Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>]

Hello!

On 8/3/2017 3:51 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:

> Add documentation to describe usage of the new fixed transceiver binding.
> This new binding is applicable for any CAN device therefore it exists as
> its own document.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
> ---
>   .../bindings/net/can/fixed-transceiver.txt         | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fixed-transceiver.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fixed-transceiver.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fixed-transceiver.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2f58838b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fixed-transceiver.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +Fixed transceiver Device Tree binding
> +------------------------------
> +
> +CAN transceiver typically limits the max speed in standard CAN and CAN FD
> +modes. Typically these limitations are static and the transceivers themselves
> +provide no way to detect this limitation at runtime. For this situation,
> +the "fixed-transceiver" node can be used.
> +
> +Required Properties:
> + max-bitrate:	a positive non 0 value that determines the max
> +		speed that CAN/CAN-FD can run. Any other value
> +		will be ignored.
> +
> +Examples:
> +
> +Based on Texas Instrument's TCAN1042HGV CAN Transceiver
> +
> +m_can0 {
> +	....
> +	fixed-transceiver@0 {

    The <unit-address> (after @) must only be specified if there's "reg" prop 
in the device node. Also, please name the node "can-transceiver@" to be more 
in line with the DT spec. which requires generic node names.

[...]

MBR, Sergei