mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Chuck Wolber <chuck@wolber.net>,
	Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/20] gcov: fix gcov_info_add() merge semantics for IOR counters
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 18:50:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f94b603b-1e5d-45c0-871b-4bc96941b47a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103015238.3780910-18-sashal@kernel.org>

On 03.11.2026 02:52, Sasha Levin wrote:
> gcov_info_add() unconditionally uses += to merge all counter types.
> This is wrong for counters that use IOR merge semantics (bitwise OR),
> such as GCOV_COUNTER_IOR and GCC 14's GCOV_COUNTER_CONDS (MC/DC
> condition coverage). These counters store bitsets that must be merged
> with |=, not accumulated with +=.
> 
> Detect IOR merge semantics by comparing the merge function pointer
> against __gcov_merge_ior, matching how GCC's own libgcov identifies
> merge semantics. This fixes the pre-existing bug for GCOV_COUNTER_IOR
> and also enables correct merging for MC/DC condition coverage data.
> 
> Fixes: 5f41ea0386a5 ("gcov: add support for gcc 4.7 gcov format")
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>


-- 
Peter Oberparleiter
Linux on IBM Z Development - IBM Germany R&D

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-05 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-03  1:52 [PATCH v2 00/20] Unify code coverage and add Clang source-based coverage with MC/DC Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] coverage: move gcov and kcov under kernel/coverage/ Sasha Levin
2026-11-05 17:38   ` Peter Oberparleiter
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] kbuild: unify static coverage instrumentation as COVERAGE_PROFILE Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] coverage: add a common debugfs interface Sasha Levin
2026-11-05 17:49   ` Peter Oberparleiter
2026-11-06  1:05     ` Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] compiler_types.h: Don't instrument __always_inline functions for coverage Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] context_tracking: Always inline the empty stubs called from noinstr code Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] lockdep: " Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] perf: Always inline the empty perf_lopwr_cb() stub Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] rseq: Always inline the empty stubs called from noinstr code Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] x86: Always inline " Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] x86/sev: Use non-instrumented bitops in the GHCB accessors Sasha Levin
2026-11-04 13:36   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] objtool: Detect code coverage instrumentation in noinstr code Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] x86/sev: Stop excluding noinstr.o from code coverage Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] x86/entry: Stop excluding the entry code from KCOV Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] coverage: add Clang's source-based code coverage Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] x86: Enable " Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] coverage: add MC/DC measurement Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] gcov: fix gcov_info_add() merge semantics for IOR counters Sasha Levin
2026-11-05 17:50   ` Peter Oberparleiter [this message]
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] kconfig: add CC_HAS_CONDITION_COVERAGE for MC/DC support detection Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] gcov: add MC/DC condition coverage support Sasha Levin
2026-11-05 17:56   ` Peter Oberparleiter
2026-11-06  1:05     ` Sasha Levin
2026-11-03  1:52 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] Documentation: dev-tools: document the common code coverage interface Sasha Levin
2026-11-05 17:36 ` [PATCH v2 00/20] Unify code coverage and add Clang source-based coverage with MC/DC Peter Oberparleiter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f94b603b-1e5d-45c0-871b-4bc96941b47a@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chuck@wolber.net \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=fhrbata@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®