mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gmu 2k6" <gmu2006@gmail.com>
To: davids@webmaster.com
Cc: "Thomas Stewart" <thomas@stewarts.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Only 3.2G ram out of 4G seen in an i386 box
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:51:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f96157c40608082351j301efa57n412284f8d28124ef@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKKEDCNKAB.davids@webmaster.com>

On 8/8/06, David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> wrote:
>
> > Replying to Thomas Stewart:
>
> > > Hi,
> > > I have a Dell Optiplex GX280, a Pentium 4 with an Intel chipset. It has
> > > 4G of ram. The problem is I can only see 3.2G, even tho the bios reports
> > > 4G.
>
> > Chipset issue. Some Intel chipsets are doing strange things with memory
> > map. They call this "design flaw" but not offered free replacements
> > yet, so, for example, on SE7221BK1E you can't use more than 3 gigs.
>
>        It is quite funny to read Intel's technical note on this, as they try to
> make it seem like they're blaming the operating system. For example:
>
> When the Intel E7221 chipset is populated to its maximum memory capacity of
> 4 GB (Giga Bytes), the Operating System (OS) may report a significantly
> lower amount of available memory.
>
>        Yeah, that stupid operating system.
>
> These requirements may reduce the addressable memory space available to and
> reported by the Operating System. These memory ranges, while unavailable to
> the OS, are still being utilized by subsystems such as I/O, PCI Express and
> Integrated Graphics and are critical to the proper functioning of the
> server.
>
> Use of Available memory below 4 GB by system resources is not specific to
> Intel chipsets, but rather a limitation of existing PC architectures and
> current limitations of some 32-bit operating systems. Some 32-bit operating
> systems may not be capable of recognizing greater than 2 GB of memory. This
> issue potentially impacts any chipset with 4GB maximum memory configuration.
>
> Intel has addressed this from a hardware perspective in future platforms,
> anticipating that future Operating Systems will provide greater than 4 GB of
> memory support.
>
>        Last but not least, their solution.
>
> Corrective Action / Resolution
> Intel Server Board SE7221BK1-E system BIOS will be updated to properly
> indicate the following information screens augment memory configuration
> characteristics for the Intel Server Board SE7221BK1-E and Intel Server
> Platform SR1425BK1-E customers.
>  Total physical memory populated in the system
>  Total memory dedicated to motherboard resources
>  Total memory reported as available to the operating system
> This information will align to the INT15h E820h standard that BIOS uses to
> communicate memory usage to the operating system. This BIOS feature will
> clarify the memory subsystem support and usage for the end user.
>
>        Are these technical notes supposed to be so funny?
>
>        DS

I guess this is all related to older Intel chipsets, right? I mean the
chipset *75X something I'm going to have in the new box I will get
soonish will support up to 8 GiB. I hope it does not mean that it will
be capped at 7.4GiB although I will only have 4GiB installed for now.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-09  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-08  8:24 Thomas Stewart
2006-08-08 10:15 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2006-08-08 19:51   ` David Schwartz
2006-08-09  6:51     ` gmu 2k6 [this message]
2006-08-09 14:48       ` Joel Jaeggli
2006-08-09 14:54         ` gmu 2k6
2006-08-10 21:09           ` Simen Thoresen
2006-08-11 11:08             ` gmu 2k6
2006-08-13 10:54               ` Simen Thoresen
2006-08-10 13:04         ` Thomas Stewart
2006-08-08  9:13 Mikael Pettersson
2006-08-08 10:01 ` Thomas Stewart
     [not found] <fa.FhtZk3YiH9OyGCt4iXIGt+vYtos@ifi.uio.no>
2006-08-08 14:22 ` Robert Hancock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f96157c40608082351j301efa57n412284f8d28124ef@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gmu2006@gmail.com \
    --cc=davids@webmaster.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas@stewarts.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®