Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Add metrics for neoverse-n2-v2

[Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>]

在 2023/1/15 上午6:40, Ian Rogers 写道:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 8:32 AM Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 在 2023/1/13 下午5:59, John Garry 写道:
>>> On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote:
>>>> Changes since v6:
>>>> - Split patch #1 into 3 smaller patches as suggested by Ian.
>>>> - Change perf_pmu__get_slots into perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle,
>>>>    per John's suggestion;
>>>> - Return NAN instead of 0 in perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle weak
>>>>    function, per John's suggestion;
>>>> - Factor out pmu_core__find_same function, per John's suggestion.
>>>> - Link:https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/1673017529-1429208-1-git-send-email-renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!LhBq67uDCOsz1k7ZF4aQPHF0Bp8FsMr-ZNgCnBSUKF4qJTFODfnkId7lw_NXqB4qZUCpu-jbY8z8LTckoqFGz2Q8bA$
>>>
>>> This looks fine. But for this code:
>>>
>>> On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote:
>>>> +double perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    char path[PATH_MAX];
>>>> +    unsigned long long slots = 0;
>>>
>>> I would prefer if this returned NAN (and not 0) for when we can't find a pmu or the value from ./caps/slots is zero, but I am not going to get too hung up on that.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, I like this way too.
>>
>>> For series:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
>>
>> Thank you very much indeed!
> 
> Aside a naming nit in 1/9 for series:
> 
> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> 

Thank you sincerely!

> Thanks,
> Ian